• anon6789@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    Just to look at that a different way, 1970 = 1 fed employee for every 72.5 citizens, 2024 = 1 fed employee for every 113.3 citizens. Add on top of that a budget that likely has not increased proportionally, and the strain gets even greater. So it sounds like our government is able to operate half as effectively as it was in the 70s, and they think that is too much.

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      operate half as effectively

      I think you mean double effective. Seeing as each fed needs to cater for double the populace.

      • anon6789@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        We mean the same thing I believe. I phrased it thinking of how on a per citizen basis they now only have half a fed workers time they used to, while your phrasing comes at it from the employee has to do twice as much with the same resources.

        I’ll concede I probably was not clear in the way I intended and I appreciate you reframing my thoughts for me. 😅

        • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          No you’re right. Now that I’ve slept on it I see your point. When looking from the population perspective there are half as many fed agents available so they are half as effective (increased wait times, reduction of services etc).

          • anon6789@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            We have succeeded in getting each other to see it though the other person’s perspective, so this has turned into a better comment chain than probably 90% of political posts! 😁