• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Ukraine already made peace when they gave up their nuclear weapons in exchange for Russia’s promise that they would respect Ukraine’s sovereignty in the Belarus Memorandum in 1994. A promise which Russia broke repeatedly.

      Russia has demonstrated over and over again that it will not abide by its own peace agreements. Russia cannot be trusted to honor any treaty. There can be no peace so long as Russia is a duplicitous kleptocracy.

      • fallowseed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        "In 2014, after a well-prepared[3] US-sponsored anti-Russian coup in Kyiv, Ukrainian ultranationalists banned the official use of Russian and other minority languages in their country and, at the same time, affirmed Ukraine’s intention to become part of NATO. Among other consequences, Ukrainian membership in NATO would place Russia’s 250-year-old naval base in the Crimean city of Sebastopol under NATO and hence U.S. control. Crimea was Russian-speaking and had several times voted not to be part of Ukraine. So, citing the precedent of NATO’S violent intervention to separate Kosovo from Serbia, Russia organized a referendum in Crimea that endorsed its reincorporation in the Russian Federation. The results were consistent with previous votes on the issue.

        Meanwhile, in response to Ukraine’s banning of the use of Russian in government offices and education, predominantly Russian-speaking areas in the country’s Donbas region attempted to secede. Kyiv sent forces to suppress the rebellion. Moscow responded by backing Ukrainian Russian speakers’ demands for the minority rights guaranteed to them by both the pre-coup Ukrainian constitution and the principles of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). NATO backed Kyiv against Moscow. An escalating civil war among Ukrainians ensued. This soon evolved into an intensifying proxy war in Ukraine between the United States, NATO, and Russia."

        from former ambassador chas freeman. you know what came after this ? a brokered peace agreement by osce france and germany in which various terms were settled which neither france, nor germany, nor ukraine were intending to uphold. this is the minsk agreement.

        there’s a lot you like to leave out, and i’m sure you’ll deign to forget this history, too.

        edit: to the one user who upvoted me: i see you, bless your heart and open mind- more than makes up for the dozens upon dozens of salty idealogues

            • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Nah, posts like an American who started with good intentions but has taken America bad to mean that places that oppose the US therefore must be good/better.

              The speech by the former US diplomat they like to post is worth a read, as despite some odd dubious or cherry picked data the conclusions are bang on the money, and it is right about it all being a very real politik, not actually good for Ukraine, approach by the US and NATO.

              It also has the former diplomat state that Europe (that famously single and unanimous entity), as well as Zelensky (at least before 2024) and Ukraine want peace, and the US and Russia are both more involved in prolonging war to better their own outcomes.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I could believe that of any major country directly profiting from this. But what’s your reliable source for all that, especially Zelenskyy?

      • fallowseed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        i consider chas freeman to be my most reliable western source, but i’m sure there are others.

            • Lemminary@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              And which one would you say touches the heart of the matter of what you say? My time is limited. I think a direct quote would be a great place to start.

              • fallowseed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                i guess the many lessons one is a good start and broad edit: again someone is cycling through alt accounts and downvoting everything i’ve posted… lol, let’s hope its a bot and someone isn’t wasting their actual time to totally own me with downvotes.

      • fallowseed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        okay now that i’ve given you what you asked for and its been subsequently downvoted, maybe you’d like to share some of your wonderful and trustworthy sources?

        edit: lol, second time some weirdo has gone through my entire comment history and downvoted everything i’ve posted in the last days. stay classy!

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Uh, no. I literally just read your reply right now. But you can be confidently wrong about all that.

          • fallowseed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            i said ‘some weirdo’ sorry if you feel that i’m implicating you. still waiting on your sources though.

            • Lemminary@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              That can absolutely be me, but you were wrong, so by circumstance doesn’t apply this time. The intent was there nonetheless.

              And I’m still waiting on yours.