It’s about time that Intuit was called out for their scam. Hopefully, the attempt to stop the federal tax filing will get dismissed as well.

  • Gray@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    250
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck Intuit and H&R Block, all my homies use FreeTaxUSA.

    • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      1 year ago

      A (now ex) coworker turned me on to FreeTaxUSA like a decade ago and I’ve been using it every year since then. It’s easy, free (for federal) and just works. I usually pay the $15 for them to file state/school since I’m a lazy fuck but really, my time is worth something after all. I’ve had zero complaints with them.

        • scottywh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          Formerly Credit Karma taxes because Credit Karma was bought by Intuit, believe it or not, and they had to spin off the tax prep part.

          • bakachu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Huh I did not know this. CK was my backup to FT USA but that is indeed some sneaky shit. I’m scared now for FT USA - PLEASE DO NOT SELL OUT.

            • scottywh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I used Credit Karma taxes for several years and have actually used the Cash app Taxes for the last two years since the switch and while it’s not quite as good as it was under the CK umbrella it’s still been mostly okay for me.

      • Humanoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It also works smooth with state taxes! I used to have to manually fill out a pdf and attach for the state portion of the return with other software.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My wife and I have slightly complex taxes. We pay a local independent tax preparer to do it for us. I’d much rather my money go to a hard working neighbor than a scam-baiting company like intuit.

    • jayandp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      FTUSA is amazing. It’s either free or super cheap, depending on your state and income. I wish I knew about them sooner. I did my taxes on my phone at work during a slow shift.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have used FreeTaxUSA. One year FreeTaxUSA was giving me a pretty low return number, so I went with TurboTax instead. I agree FreeTaxUSA is cheaper, but make sure you cross compare to ensure you aren’t leaving money on the table.

      At this point though, my taxes are so complicated, I just hire a professional.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is absolutely wild that it’s so bad over there, that you’re gushing over a service that should just be provided by the government in the first place (and is, in most developed countries)

      • Gray@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For context, the reason I’m hating on Intuit and H&R Block and encouraging people to use FreeTaxUSA is because the first two are the main culprits behind the extensive lobbying that has led to the US government continuing to require people to file their own taxes rather than modernizing and making this process free and easy. My “gushing” is in pursuit of changing the broken system you’re pointing out.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sorry, didn’t mean it to come across as insulting, just that it’s a weird situation you even need to be praising one of the others. I hope it gets better

          • Gray@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No worries. You’re right that it’s absurd that we need to fight so much for our government to protect us from blatant corporate for-profit schemes. There was a time when even the US government at least did us the honor of pretending to not take bribes like this. The Intuit tax return money machine is such an obviously fixable problem. All my 20-something friends in the US know that this problem only exists because of lobbying. It’s disgusting to watch elected representatives become so comfortable with their positions that they feel safe enacting policies that hurt their constituents like this.

    • HorseWithNoName@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      FreeTaxUSA also tried to charge me for state after saying it was free though.

      I guess I could have printed out the forms I had just filled out and mailed them, but that’s not exactly what was advertised. It’s “free tax filing” not “free forms.” I paid it because it was cheap, but then they kept kicking both my federal and state back to me with error messages saying they were not “accepted” by the IRS.

      Cash app had no issues with the exact same information being “accepted.” It just worked. And it was actually free.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        FreeTaxUSA was very clear that state isn’t free. But if your state doesn’t suck they’ll make it easy to do online on your state site anyway.

        Also it’s like $15 for state. I may have just happily paid that price for their service.

  • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    159
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love how it’s gone so far beyond “We would like to assist people in paying their taxes.”

    “We would like to prevent the US government from examining the possibility of creating it’s own online tax filing portal.”

    “We would like to advertise our product as free using government channels and grants only to then turn around after the user has input their most sensitive data into our database and attempt to wring them for $100.00 or not be bound by our privacy policy.”

    • solstice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Feels like every Evil Corporation ™ has gone this route. In ye olden days it used to be a competitive market where businesses tried to provide the best product and services for the best prices. Then at some point everyone collectively decided to start doing as little as possible without getting sued. I’m so sick of it.

      Regarding tax compliance for individuals, if you have the slightest complications in your financial situation, it might be best to pay a small time preparer $500 to deal with the hassle. Software isn’t cheap these days so might as well pay a small premium for the better service a pro provides. (Disclaimer: I am a pro so my opinion is biased.)

      • bakachu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agree, would rather my money went to a local firm with an actual person who I can consistently contact for questions. Did this a few years ago for an especially challenging tax year. Absolutely 0 regrets - if I had done it via self-serve software I would’ve missed out on quite a few unknown tax assists that the accountant found.

      • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was in the specific moment that tort reform limited damages to 250,000 because they blamed an old Lady for getting burned by her 170° coffee. Though she was awarded like 7.6 million as an additive damage because.mcdonalds had been gently warned several times before

        • solstice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why, because it’s cheaper to get sued for a few bucks than to not be a shitty company? Interesting. Like Ed Norton’s car recall equation in Fight Club. Got a source? Not challenging you but I’m curious if that’s your opinion or a known concept.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every time you see a post like this, remember that one of your elected officials lined their pockets to fuck the entire country for generations ahead

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      You left out the best part… The amount is often extremely low. Just a few grand to the old PAC that directly feeds their campaign which is just a slush fund for their personal use.

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        When you’re the kind of person to do this, the number doesn’t matter. It’s the fact that you will get away with it

    • Nefrayu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In Ireland and I believe most other European countries the tax is just taken out of your salary/wage by your employer and sent to Revenue. So unless you do something taxable outside of a normal wage you largely don’t need to worry about it.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is in the U.S. too, but you often either owe more than was taken out or are due a refund because too much was taken out. But you need tax software in order to figure that out because it’s so damn complicated half the time.

        • Nefrayu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh that sounds somehow more annoying than just having to pay it yourself, seeing as you have to do the calculations yourself anyway.

          To be fair it possible to be owed a refund or owe extra tax in Ireland too. If you changed jobs and didn’t inform Revenue they won’t apply tax credits until they know the full story for example. You never have to calculate how much you owe or are due though, at least not for an individual. You just tell them what your salary is, or if you’re claiming a credit.

          • brianorca@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            The US allows deductions, which can come from a large number of sources. Some examples include interest paid on the mortgage of your primary residence, certain health care costs, or charitable giving. Since your job doesn’t know about those, they can’t make that calculation in your payroll withholding.

            • Gromit83@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Health care costs in Europe? Nice try. We are taxed for that. What he meant is that in desember you usually get a notice from the tax office about next years tax rate. In 2024 you’ll probably pay this much taxes and have these deductions. Is this correct? You’ll have time to change it if you need to and then a set tax rate is made to pay for your taxes for 2024, which is then deducted from you pay check.

              Come 2025 and tax season you should have a tax bill for 2024 at 0. If everything checked out. Should be said that the tax office always tax a bit more to be on the safe side.

              Only thing I have to do each year is moving half of the paid interest to my girlfriend. (if we were married that would have happened automatically)

              Also in my country all charitable donations above 50 USD is registered and gets laid out the tax form. You only get deductions over 50 USD with wire transfer. Paid in cash doesn’t count.

              It’s really easy as it should be.

            • Nefrayu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can do that in Ireland too. For health insurance the insurer handles the tax and takes it off what they charge you. For charities if you donate over a certain threshold the charity gets to claim back the tax you paid for themselves. For ongoing things you inform Revenue and they let your employer know to collect less tax. Then for other things you just tell Revenue and they refund you.

          • anonono@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh that sounds somehow more annoying than just having to pay it yourself, seeing as you have to do the calculations yourself anyway.

            it was never about the convenience of the worker, but about making sure they pay. companies act as tax retention agents.

        • irotsoma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The reason is that rich people have lots of loopholes to avoid tax and a lot of them just flat out file fraudulently. If the system was simpler, then they’d have to actually pay their taxes because it would be easy to detect.

      • reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but it’s much easier for the rich to find loop holes and not pay their fair share our way. So you see, it’s much better! /s

  • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember one time I spent an hour filing taxes, I accidentally hit a premium option, it literally didn’t let me go back to free. On top of that it kept piling on charges. Fuck intuit. Thieving pieces of shit.

    • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      HRBlock is the same.

      I refused to use them ever again after they tried to charge me $300 when it was listed as “free”

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      My brother accidentally hit premium a few years ago and the free option is just gone for good for him. It’s such bull shit. I’ve never paid with turbo tax and was convinced he was doing something wrong. Nope, it’s literally not available anymore for him.

  • downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    Intuit is not your friend or ally, or anyone you want to do business with, or have an account on their many myriad of financial web sites, which they are gobbling up all the time

  • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like this might be a good time to plug the IRS Free File Program. It’s a program that allows lower-income people to file their tax returns for free. While the program has been gutted in recent years by companies like Intuit leaving the program to either stop offering their services for free or to start offering a “free” alternative, it’s still viable. I used it last year to file my taxes.

  • MrEUser@lemmy.ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    They should have been forced to do it the other way. “You advertise as free, so you have to provide this for free.”

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck the politicians that allow this shit to exist. Good on this move, but to be clear, it’s the same folks who enabled it.

  • bakachu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use TurboTax ina free way - calculate all my taxes using their amazing software and then when the numbers match on the free site, I file there. That’s the beauty of TurboTax that you can exploit. I feel it’s fair game knowing they make the software open and then trick people who have calculated everything out to pay a ridiculous amount for the filing fee at the end.

  • Thom Gray@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Services provided by for profit corporations are almost never truly free. It usually means “free” in exchange for access to your user data or “free” if you watch these advertisements. That’s not free, it’s an exchange of your data that’s valuable for resell to a company or your time to watch their ads.

  • Chloyster [She/Her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Intuit will appeal this groundless and seemingly predetermined decision by the FTC to rule in its own favor and is confident that when the matter ultimately returns to a neutral body Intuit will prevail, as it has previously in this matter,” the company said.

    Lmao

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The initial decision by Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell was released today and is subject to an automatic review by the full commission.

    Moreover, if an Intuit good or service is not free for most US taxpayers, that fact must be “disclosed clearly and conspicuously at the outset of any disclosures required” by the order.

    The ruling said that “Intuit had removed several of the most plausibly deceptive advertisements—that is, three videos that repeated the word ‘free’ a dozen or more times over 30 seconds before a very brief disclaimer.”

    “However, if Intuit resumes its full advertising campaign… or the facts on the ground change significantly, the FTC may return to this Court to request relief,” US District Judge Charles Breyer wrote.

    In its response to the administrative law judge’s decision, Intuit said it expected the ruling because of the FTC’s “flawed and highly questionable process, Chair Lina Khan’s previous public and prejudicial statements against Intuit, and the fact that the FTC has ruled in its own favor in nearly every consumer protection case for the last two decades.”

    “We believe the FTC’s decision is improper, wholly ignores the facts, and tramples on the foundations of an independent American judicial system with its serving as prosecutor, judge, and jury on its own matters,” Intuit said.


    The original article contains 860 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!