The title is err, not correct because the top 2 alternatives Opera and Arc are based on Chromium engine. I have seen tons of people swear by Arc, but I am seriously asking (since as a Linux user I can’t use it), how much good can a browser be in this day and age if ultimately it’s ad blocking breaks and it will since Manifest v2 will go soon(unless Arc folks have a solution for it)

The rest alternatives are Firefox, Zen (FF fork but honestly Atleast this was something new I learned from this article) and Tor (which is weird since it is not meant for normal web browsing and using it will not only be slow but put additional strain on the nodes, correct me if I am wrong).

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    11 days ago

    I switched from Firefox to Floorp and haven’t looked back. Less bloated, same features, haven’t found an extension that isn’t compatible yet.

    Same with Fennec on Android.

    This article is pretty poor overall. Why recommend Arc, a browser that requires a user account to even open a webpage, and which the author himself said will probably be disappearing in the near future as part of their own product strategy?

    Lame clickbait aimed at nobody.

      • Clot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 days ago

        For me, librewolf focuses too much on privacy sacrificing features, I personally dont like zen’s design. There’s others like waterfox but didnt tried them

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        It sounded on base value like the least effort when switching from Firefox. It basically came down to Floorp and LW. I tried the former first and didn’t see a need to continue looking.

    • jef@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Floorp is a nightmare from my experience, I’ve tried it about 2 years ago, it was pretty cool but insanely buggy, I’ve been trying it maybe once every 2 months ever since and it hasn’t gotten better IMO, if you customize almost anything in the ui, things will break eventually, and I always get frequent freezes and crashes.

      At this point I just use Firefox with Betterfox user.JS and its been great, you get ff updates as fast as they come out since it’s not a frok, also has all bloat and telemetry disabled, whenever I try out another browser I just switch back to ff for one reason or another.

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I haven’t had many bugs but I’m primarily using it on a MacBook, so maybe it’s more stable than on Linux? Though that in itself would also be a bother as I have a Linux desktop that I want to install on, so I’ll be looking out for these issues when I do.

      • Bilb!@lem.monster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I wonder if floorp has improved, because people are talking it up lately. My experience a few months ago was like yours, it was very buggy.

    • klu9@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Have you tried Firedragon? Floorp-based but with some eye candy and privacy enhancements. (Linux only at the moment)

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Always has been.

      Right beside the fact that their monetary model relies on user activity tracking. Yet they advertise privacy.

      A browser that had a seemingly unlimited budget for advertising before it even had users is suspicious as hell.

      I’ve never trusted brave.

    • Darken@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      This list to me feels like AI trying to average the commoner internet

      And the comments here really show it

    • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I beg to differ, when Opera had its own engine and wasn’t Chinese owned - back in the early '00s.

      • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Opera also was a good alternative on Symbian phones right or whatever OS Nokia used before they switched to Windows Phone, I think.

        • Rinox@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          Opera mini was also great when I had very little MBs of internet traffic in my plan. Nowadays I have pretty much infinite traffic, so I haven’t used it in ages

          • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            I think I remember Opera Mini’s layout though I didn’t much use it. It was a great alternative especially on mobile more than a decade back.

            But yes especially after changing ownership, switching browser engines and years down the line; things have changed.

            I think I gave their desktop variant a try sometime ago but didn’t find it compelling enough. I haven’t even used their Android fork. I keep using a Firefox fork only :p.

        • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          I suspect that we may be looking back with rose tinted glasses, but the main stream internet is pretty crap atm

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Opera was so good. Disable images, force custom CSS, gestures! Stuff no one else had at the time.

      • tomjuggler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        Yeah I was 100% Opera on desktop and mobile until they switched to chromium and broke everything from before. Still pissed about that, lost all my bookmarks and notes at one point.

      • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        Many sites have become worse. I think stuff like Cnet, PCMag (which still has a digital magazine I think)were much better in the previous era.

    • klu9@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      As someone who used Opera 2002-2013 (Presto era), I quibble with the “always”.

      But I do not quibble with the “is”.

        • klu9@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah, me too. Never used it since.

          So I was glad when Opera co-founder von Tetzchner announced Vivaldi, and I did use it for a couple of years. But I don’t want to become dependent on something not completely FLOSS, so lately using mainly Firefox mods like Floorp, Zen and Firedragon.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            My history w/ browsers:

            1. IE - everyone started here
            2. Firefox - switched once I heard about it
            3. Chrome - when it came out, it was fast, which was cool
            4. Opera - switched as soon as I heard about it; was about as fast as Chrome
            5. Firefox - switched when Opera became a Chromium browser

            Since I came from old IE days and started my career having to backport stuff to IE, I care a lot about engine competition, because IE owning everything made everything worse. So that’s still my #1 concern today, hence why I use Firefox.

            I do dabble with Firefox forks though. I use Fennec on my phone, am trying out Mullvad on my laptop, etc. But I’m going to stay within the Gecko-family of browsers until a viable alternative to Blink (Chrome’s engine) emerges (e.g. Servo or LadyBird).

    • Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yep. Dont use Opera. They are known for being an incredibly scummy company that has done illegal things. Im 98% sure opera gx is spyware

    • wedge@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      It was an excellent standalone install porn browser for a couple of decades. God seed Opera… God speed.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Eww opera, at least it’s slightly better than opera gx

    Edit: TOR? I stopped treating this guy seriously once I read this. Nobody uses TOR for regular browsing. They’re full of shit.

    • Manalith@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      I tried Opera GX because it advertised the ability limit RAM consumption, and then I found out that the lowest it could go was 1GB which was not as low as I wanted.

  • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Zen browser is really nice imo. The developers update it very frequently.

    One drawback is that it lacks widevine support, which means that things like netflix won’t work.

    • Propheticus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 days ago

      Zen looks nice and some of the UX concepts (workspaces, glance, split sidebar from vertical tabs) work well. The ‘fit & finish’ and the way changes are pushed (unilaterally? Unvalidated with endusers?) feels very much like a 1 man hobby project though.

      • jimi_henrik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I agree, it also has some serious security issues: https://github.com/zen-browser/desktop/pull/927

        The developer’s comment reveals that it has been there since the inception of the project. And there are even more privacy / security issues mentioned in the comments.

        Unfortunately Zen browser gets a big fat no from me. 🫤

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I will give Zen browser a try. As for Netflix, I only used it for a one month since it’s quite expensive in my country and it crawled like anything on Firefox for Linux. I was getting consistent 720p video but not sure about full HD. Eventually I canceled it.

      • klu9@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        IIRC major streaming services like Netflix and Prime do not offer 1080p or 4k streams to Linux browsers, mainly for technical reasons. You have to use some tricks (special extensions or add-ons?) to get anything above 720p.

          • klu9@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            IIRC it was something to do with the difficulty of getting the browser to use hardware acceleration/GPU in the countless variations of Linux, to the point where they don’t even bother trying because of the infinitesimally small market share of each distro.

            But I’m not 100% sure of that.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    Of that list, Zen is the only one really worth considering. And then you have the “but the best one that supports widevine” issue.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    Ironically, I could not reach the end of the list because the fucking ads kept reloading the page and scrolling me to the top. Anyone know which of these 6 would block that?

  • stochastictrebuchet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’ve really been enjoying Vivaldi. It’s also Chromium-based. It’s easy to customize and it has really good tab management. You can group tabs into workspaces, open split panes, and – this one I really appreciate – you can stack tabs by domain. Added bonus is that the company behind it, Vivaldi Technologies, is Norwegian, which ticks the ‘shop European’ box for me.

    As for ad blocking, the shittiness of manifest v3 made me look at options outside the browser rather than rely on extensions. These days I pass all my traffic through adguard, which filters out ads from the request responses. All in all this has been a positive step, because now I can play around with any browser without ever seeing ads.

    • wingsfortheirsmiles@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I like Vivaldi but all the manifest V3 stuff just pushed me to Librewolf for everything whether it works or not, so maybe I should “thank” Google

    • stochastictrebuchet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      Gotta say, it’s kind of a bummer to be downvoted for sharing my own experience. Are those ‘disagree’ or ‘doesn’t contribute to discussion’ votes?

      • lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Don’t take it to heart, bro. I saw people downwoting for an honest “thanks”. 😄

      • Engywook@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I’ll link an unpopular opinion I posted yesterday: https://lemm.ee/post/59167603

        My own comment has been: “Don’t you dare to have opinions that don’t align with mainstream thinking here”.

        Here either you praise Mozilla/Firefox/Gecko or you are insulted and treated like a pest. And that’s a deterrent for me to even look at Mozilla/Firefox/Gecko. I prefer not to be part of that community.

    • Engywook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      AdGuard (the app, not the extension or the DNS) should do it. I guess.

  • quid_pro_joe@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I didn’t see Waterfox mentioned in the article or comments, so I’m giving it a shout out now. Firefox is still my #1 browser, which I have synced to all my critical accounts, and use very cautiously, only using a few trustwothy extensions. However, when I want to explore unfamiliar domains or experiment with lesser-known browser extensions, I’ve relied on the equally dependable Waterfox browser. It’s fast, free, and 99% the same as Firefox except it’s a completely different app so you can basically have 2 Firefoxes set up and customized for completely different roles. Between the two, I can keep Chrome frozen on my phone and off my desktop (although I have a portable Chromium on USB for emergencies).

    • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      You do know Firefox has profiles you can use to effectively make it two (or more) separate browsers?

      Not shitting on Waterfox, just FYI.

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I have Waterfox setup as an alternative browser but it does not have much stuff to differentiate itself from mainstream FF, as you said.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 days ago

      Google could close the Chromium source at any time. There might be promises and provisions that they’ll never do that, but if they do, who has the money to sue them? And who, of those, can’t be bought?

      “So what, people can run with the last good codebase!”

      Sure, until there’s a critical bug that Google don’t publish which then cripples Chromium until the maintainers figure it out, or else Google (deliberately or otherwise) take web standards down an unexpected path requiring massive changes, also making life hard for the fork maintainers.

      And don’t say “that’ll never happen”. Need I gesture broadly at the state of the world?

      • Engywook@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Whatever. Chromium is not Chrome, at the moment, so the title is correct. What may happen in 2,5 or 10 years from now is largely irrelevant at this time.

        Nobody is going to ditch their favourite browser (or any other tool) because of the rants of some random netizen/website.

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Firefox can do so too with TST or one of the other extensions in the store. Sometimes(atleast for me), they introduce slightly more lag when opening the browser but otherwise, they can do much of the job. I use Tree Style Tabs even though I might not be a power user of it (read:not actively using every nitty gritty of the extension).

      • RexWrexWrecks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        I agree. I’m a pretty happy Firefox user. I am not a power-user of tabs anyway, I try to keep my open tabs to a minimum.

  • PeteZa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I may get some hate for this but Safari is superior IMO. Especially with the private relay I get with my iCloud+ plan.