Following months of testing, Plex has started to roll out its redesigned mobile app to Android and iOS devices, and it will arrive to everyone within the next week. The new app comes with an updated navigation system that should make it easier to access different parts of the app and find content to watch, along with a dedicated tab for centralized media libraries.

It also has a button in the top-right corner of the screen for your Watchlist and more artwork across detail pages for shows and movies, as well as cast and crew profiles. In a post on the Plex forum, the company outlines a ton of improvements it has made to the app since the preview, including faster load times and scrolling, the addition of a sleep timer, and picture-in-picture support.

  • ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    And Jellyfin is better and free. I don’t trust Plex with my content and I don’t want their added streaming bloatware.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      In some ways it is… In others it’s definitely not.

      My biggest problem is that I can’t expose it on a domain for my family to get to. They don’t know how to VPN and to educate them would be exhausting.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Cool… point me to the LG TV tailscale app… or the roku tailscale app…

          SDNs in general are no different. App support is limited, specifically on devices that people are most likely to want to watch media content on.

          And to say that tailscale is “that’s it” is a bit disingenuous. On my setup (LXC containers) I couldn’t add tailscale even if I wanted without faffing with interface stuff.

      • ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        So I have a NAS running Ubuntu I only keep my movies, my Jellyfin, and torrent software on in an isolated VLAN I stream from. I would think this would make any security issue with Jellyfin a dead end. I stream all content from Jellyfin domain I made and never use it locally. I stream off it at home from my VPN. This seems a safe way to stream where it can be used away from home unless I am missing something? Pointing out any holes in my logic is appreciated.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          If it’s a private VPN, you should be fine. If it’s publicly accessible the jellyfin access through a vpn itself doesn’t matter. They can just subpoena a request to your domain registrar to get your information since the IP won’t yield anything useful for them.

          • ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            The VPN is a paid no-log VPN out of Panama. The traffic goes through the VPN applied to the VLAN and my device I stream to uses a different connection to the same VPN service. The domain is a DDNS.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              The domain is a DDNS.

              Eh, if that’s operating in the US (or other country that cares), they may still give up the mapping to a legal request.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Because a reverse proxy doesn’t resolve any of these major issues.

          https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/5415

          Your content can be probed, identified, and streamed all without auth. Your users can be enumerated in certain cases.

          Edit: If you host legit content, like family videos… All of that can be leaked. If you don’t host legit content… and the public site gets probed and they identify the illegal content… expect to be named in a very large lawsuit… either situation is bad.

          Edit2: and hosting it behind a proxy that does it’s own auth would break ALL app-based jellyfin clients.

          • shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            @joshuaboniface on Mar 8, 2021

            Thank you for this list. We are aware of quite a few, but for reasons of backwards compatibility they’ve never been fixed. We’d definitely like to but doing so in a non-disruptive way is the hard part.

            Holy fuck what a reply.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah… ignoring potentially leaking peoples private videos for the sake of “backwards compatibility” is wild. No… When you find a critical flaw like that, you should be breaking compatibility purposefully in order to make people update to tooling/programs that support the new more secure functionality.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              Would seem so. The project is open source, and nobody is getting paid. So the lack of update makes sense to some extent.

              As cool as it is… and as much as I want to make plex shove it completely. Jellyfin just isn’t ready for prime-time.

              I run both… Jellyfin isn’t allowed to talk outside of my network at all, and I can access it over my personal VPN… But Plex is where all my users are because anything else would just be too annoying to maintain.