abhi9u@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前Python Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comexternal-linkmessage-square149fedilinkarrow-up1220arrow-down124
arrow-up1196arrow-down1external-linkPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comabhi9u@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前message-square149fedilink
minus-squareuis@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 个月前There are decades of articles on c++ optimizations, that say “use empty() instead of size()”, which is same as here.
minus-squaredreugeworst@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·30 天前except for c++ it was just to avoid a single function call, not extra indirection. also on modern compilers size() will get inlined and ultimate instructions generated by the compiler will likely be the same
There are decades of articles on c++ optimizations, that say “use empty() instead of size()”, which is same as here.
except for c++ it was just to avoid a single function call, not extra indirection. also on modern compilers size() will get inlined and ultimate instructions generated by the compiler will likely be the same