• ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    It also kind of says they only get assistance in case nuclear weapons are used. Which in this conflict actually hasn’t happened, and I am not saying that to justify the war effort here, I am just surprised this is so defined and the Ukrainian government felt that was enough.

    • woop_woop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Grammatically, it doesn’t say that. An act of aggression or a nuclear blah blah is vague enough that you can read it with or without a comma

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      “object of a threat in which nuclear weapons are used”. Just the threat of using nuclear is enough for assistance… The vague part is mainly what “assistance” might be. That what is “assistance” part is very vague in NATO too.