

Android emulators exist on both windows and Linux allowing the android variant to run on desktop. With most modern machines this is a viable alternative to running natively, with some overhead of course.
Blocking people is self care! Especially toxic ones!
Android emulators exist on both windows and Linux allowing the android variant to run on desktop. With most modern machines this is a viable alternative to running natively, with some overhead of course.
Since you seem to understand it then:
How do two clients communicsting over a proprietary network negotiate an end to end encrypted chat channel without sharing keys in an easily decrypted manner?
It seems to me that some kind of handshake needs to occur where the clients need to agree on a cypher, so how does this happen securely?
I’m not worried about encryption being broken, it just seems like if you’re handing the keys over the mail, it’s pretty easy to xray the package and copy the key, is the same not true over digital communication?
This is exactly the type of optimism we need if we’re gonna slow climate change enough to make it
This is an extremely popular opinion among those who’ve not unpacked that what you’re describing is eugenics
Not by default, but yea it is encrypted, I use almost exclusively encrypted chats through TG, even my voice and video calls are encrypted through TG.
E2e encryption is security theater though, a chance for companies to tell states “We’D lOvE tO hAnD oVeR tHaT dAtA bUt ItS eNcYpTeD”.
In reality, it doesn’t matter, if someone wants to snoop on your convos you can’t stop them.
You’re more hopeful than you’ve been given any reason to be to assume this will be over in 4 years.
Your complacency is their enforcement mechanism.
This is an XY solution but…
Telegram and similar services offer both calling and texting and can be carried across devices. It’s linked to the same phone number, all folks would have to know is “between these hours call telegram”
In the United States, political violence has ensured overrepresentation of minority populations below the poverty line. Requireing the financial means to have a child thereby limits minority procreation.
To address this, a universal basic income as well as a stipend for parents would be necessary. In the US, this is far away from ever happening, eere actively moving in the opposite direction. Mandatory birth control in this country is eugenics.