Its by design. If they have an unruly person they want to just get rid of every once in a while, kill them behind closed doors and dump the body in the swamp during a faux escape attempt. Then during the media circuit that surrounds the death you just claim the prisoner was killed by alligators in the surrounding swamp after an attempted escape.

The children yearn for the mines

What really pisses me off is that their anti-cheat forces me to use dogeOS

I literally just argued the opposite with my FiL. I think property should be illegal to inherit. If you have multiple children, you usually end up with a disagreement on what to do with it and how to split it up. It allows the consolidation of property for wealthy families.

You’re just factually wrong. Now you may have an argument that someone that’s driving drunk may be a better driver than someone that’s a bad driver while sober, but alcohol impairment reduces inhibitions, increases reaction time, impairs motor control, and alters judgement. That objectively makes you a more dangerous driver compared to your sober self.

I think I understand now. Thank you! I will be changing my paths then. It’s kind of a moot point since I’ll change my paths anyway, but for the sake of my own curiosity, i have a follow up question. Feel free to disregard it if you don’t feel like taking the time to answer.

Hypothetically, my docker setup only allows jellyfin to see /mnt/user as /storage. So jellyfin would report the path to Morbius as being:

/storage/hdd1/media/movies/Morbius_all_morbed_up.mkv

when in all actuality it would be:

/mnt/user/hdd1/media/movies/Morbius_all_morbed_up.mkv

My intuition tells me that the file path that jellyfin “sees” would be the security risk. So “/storage/hdd1/…” Is that correct?

Can someone ELI5 this for me? I have a jellyfin docker stack set up through dockstarter and managed through portainer. I also own a domain that uses cloudflare to access my Jellyfin server. Since everything is set up through docker, the containers volumes are globally set to only have access to my media storage. Assuming that my setup is insecure, wouldn’t that just mean that “hackers” would only be able to stream free media from my server?

🫳🏼🪨

For those that are curious, this decree was meant to highlight a lack of access to healthcare in the area. It’s supposed to be ridiculous to catch the attention of regional health leaders.

Lots of people make valid criticisms of Microsoft and Xbox, but one thing that no one can criticize is their dedication to making products for people with disabilities. They have been consistently releasing these products for people despite a small market for them.

Well now its a one horse race. Justin Tucker is the best kicker in the NFL.

It had 442,000 streams while Morgan “dipshit” Wallen’s song had 38.9 million according to your source.

I feed it TOS, Service Agreements, etc and have it simplify and summarize them so i can have a general idea of what is in them without 10 minutes of reading.

It’s on my desk 24/7, locked and loaded.

You’re a shitty gun-owner. Also negligent. Store your firearms in a safe.

Not even recovered. Didn’t they find them ditched into the street hours after tearing the house apart?

ONE GUY empties his clip into the back of his own squad car with a handcuffed suspect in it because of a falling acorn and now suddenly the whole force is getting an ear full… I’m sorry, but I thought this was America

There’s probably a sociology theory that would apply, but my guess would be a loss of 33% of active users over the course of 6 months.

But the Mozilla corporation is so shady! /s 🙄

I run a Jellyfin server on my SBC. Mine happens to be a Le Potato

Glad I could help! Hopefully you are able to find the right shoe for you.