Jung didn’t have much to say about self actualization I dont think. it was more Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers. The term refers to what is possible after you’ve managed to take care of all your other needs, and what is left is to become the best most genuine expression of your possibilities you can be. Most people will never get their needs met and so actualization in its purest form will be elusive and fleeting.
I’ve also been posting less after managing to upset someone. We can have a club. The shy posters club.
It’s para social. The person consuming it feels as though they are part of a relationship. EFIT: like TV but more interactive.
Limited cognitive empathy is teachable in many cases. It’s not so rare.
“And you ain’t in it!”
It’s fine to develop relationships at work and move them into “on good terms” territory if that is viable. It’s also fine if it is possible to move those viable work-friendships outside of the work environment to see if they can stand on their own. What is not smart however is to think that work-friendships are real friendships just because “we get along” at work. Most work friendships will drop you like a hot rock if you get fired. It’s important to be ready for that to happen even as you see what friendships might be viable.
Banana as Veblen good
What are the chances that they will actually be respectful do you think. Might there be a case for simply not inviting them?
Robert Heinlein, I Will Fear No Evil
“Elderly billionaire Johann Sebastian Bach Smith is being kept alive through medical support and decides to have his brain transplanted into a new body. He advertises an offer of a million dollars for the donation of a body from a brain-dead patient. Smith omits to place any restriction on the sex of the donor, so when his beautiful young female secretary, Eunice Branca, is killed, her body is used—without his knowledge and to the distress of some of those around him.”
Another temporarily embarrassed millionaire
But actually committing to do something substantially FDRish for the working man isn’t an easy sell within high level Democrat party leadership. I don’t know why this is true exactly but I expect it has to do with money and power.
Not OP but usually mash means that there is one SSID shared across multiple routers and access points
This isn’t good advice for everyone. It might not even be good advice for most people. However, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt that it would be good for you to do this.
Uncle Milton and his cat 5 anaconda …
It is said by the Eldar that in fast food restaurants there lives yet the echo of the Cheeseburger of the Ainur more than in any substance that is in this Earth; and many of the Children of Ilúvatar hearken still unsated to the ads on the Television, and yet know not for what they hunger.
Many people do not grasp the sheer size of the disparity between the truly wealthy and everyone else.
Americans are not a monolith, but instead all over the place with regard to a cultural practice like care for the elderly. If you had to summarize it might be fair to say that there is more of a sense of freedom from obligation to care for elders than in some other places, which is also driven by the baby boomer generation being so entitled and the current younger generations encountering ever worsening economic prospects which the boomers are stereotypically blind and unsympathetic towards. Also, there is a greater recognition of abuse and sometimes that leads to the recognition that ones elders have been abusive and therefore can go fuck themselves.
Awesome and funny play.
The heroes we have, not the heroes we need …