• 153 Posts
  • 135 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 29th, 2023

help-circle




  • Farva : Give me a double bacon cheeseburger.

    Burger Guy : [into mic] Double baco cheeseburger. It’s for a cop.

    Farva : What the hell’s that all about? You gonna spit in it now?

    Burger Guy : No, I just told him that so he makes it good.

    [into mic] Burger Guy : Don’t spit in that cop’s burger.

    Farva : Yeah, thanks.

    Second Burger Guy : Roger, hold the spit.

    Farva : Gimme a pie… apple.

    Burger Guy : Want me to hold the spit? Hah, just kidding officer Farva.

    Burger Guy : Want me to dimpa-size your meal for 25 cents?

    Farva : Want me to punch-a-size your face, for free?

    Burger Guy : It’s only 25 cents, and look how much more you get.

    Thorny : Look, kid, he doesn’t want it.

    Farva : I can handle this, Thorn. I don’t want it!

    Burger Guy : Uhh, right. Beverage?

    Farva : Gimme a litre o’ cola.

    Burger Guy : What?

    Farva : A litre o’ cola!

    Burger Guy : [into mic] Litrecola? Do we sell litrecola?

    Thorny : Will you just order a large, Farva?

    Farva : I don’t want a large farva. I want a goddamn litre o’ cola!

    Burger Guy : I don’t know what that is!

    Farva : Litre is French for… give me my fuckin’ cola before I break VOUS FUCKIN’ LIP!






















  • Yeah, it’s an extremely popular sentiment on the internet to scoff at software update related recalls as if they “don’t count.” 9 times out of 10 the person making the claim is a Muskrat, because this is a very common thing with Teslas and daddy Elon must be defended at all costs but every now and then they’re just a run of the mill moron unwittingly parroting Muskrat talking points.

    A recall is a recall whether the issue can be patched OTA or whether you have to drive to a dealership so they can spend 30mins swapping a random seemingly inconsequential part. The specific mechanics of the solution do not change the fact that a problem required a recall to be issued to consumers. Perpetuating the notion that these recalls should be considered “less important than a real recall” is dangerous to the point of stupidity.










  • I neither said nor implied any such thing. You brought up books written in the 1800s which is why my initial reply specifically focused on the 19th century. You’re either dumb or you’re here in bad faith, but based on your last sentence, being a weak attempt to shift the conversation from LGBTQ and non-binary people to pederasts, which is straight out of the right-wing playbook, it’s safe to assume the latter. So we’re done here.