They’re right though. Top of the line software for certain domains (CAD, photoshop) just doesn’t exist for Linux. As much as I would want it to be.

Reality: most tech workers view it as fairly rated or slightly overrated according to the real data: https://www.techspot.com/images2/news/bigimage/2023/11/2023-11-20-image-3.png

The paper I showed earlier disagrees

I think the use case is not people doing potato study but people that want to lose weight and need to know the amount of calories in the piece of cake that’s offered at the office cafeteria.

It needn’t be exact. A ballpark calorie/sugar that’s 90% accurate would be sufficient. There’s some research that suggests that’s possible: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.01082.pdf

No paywall: https://archive.ph/2023.11.12-212740/https://www.ft.com/content/8fde56b7-2515-441a-9472-30c8aedcc200
Tbh, the article doesn’t really talk about the headline. Just some history and talk about Elon musk and Twitter. Not a convincing argument about social media in general.

Yes

What are you talking about?

There’s still the European Parliament. But yeah I guess he gets the job…

“We must eat the billionaires. This is all the fault of capitalism. No wonder that’s how they make their profit.”

This sort of thing is ‘leftist’ everywhere.

I was pronouncing the una like tuna and could not figure it out

Tbh the other side is also anecdotal. There’s no stats here.

I like how kagi has a button to show “forum” replies, which very often is Reddit:

While cool and impressive, this was not a dense forest. Not dense nor a forest, which is way less ordered

I also agree bing is nowadays often superior to Google, they’re also better than DDG imo.

While it’s a good thing that Google gets serious competition, I don’t know if Microsoft is the best company for that role. In both cases the incentives are not necessarily aligned with the customer.

I’d say that a measurement always trumps arguments. At least you know how accurate they are, this statement cannot follow from reason:

The JAMA study found that 12.5% of ChatGPT’s responses were “hallucinated,” and that the chatbot was most likely to present incorrect information when asked about localized treatment for advanced diseases or immunotherapy.

Tbh the problem is not due to chat gpt but because Google doesn’t rank search results by correctness but something that is related to popularity.

What do you tell them right now? Do you ague or tell them they’re idiots?

Exactly what I was thinking of! 😂

Why does the toilet look like video game toilet?