Cloudflare keeps refusing me access for some reason, so here’s an archived version for anyone else who can’t get to the original: https://archive.is/RBsKv

I agree with those people, if we knew exactly might even understand the Answer of 42 as well.

Can’t wait for Nat geo to make a series about maga-inventions. Must be some wild never-published concepts in there.

Totally, this is how you play Trump if you don’t have a handwritten letter from your king

horse wurst?

Damn it’s been a while since a political nottheonion was actually a good nottheonion

Tell me, what have you done so far?

I know your question is retorical, but i think your point holds a dangerous truth: if other countries deserve access to nuclear weapons, the world likely ends up getting more nuclear weapons. Since there hasn’t ever been anything so deterring as nuclear weapons, that might get us closer to world peace. But it might also not.

I like this title a bit better, but someone posted this story an hour ago already: https://lemmy.world/post/31481750

However crazy, i still expect him to win the lawsuit.

I was trying to say that. Seeing others puts a ‘narrative’ that is different from theirs in your own head, because you see with your own eyes. Everybody still needs to adress all incoming information, it’s not always apparent it is a false story.

Intense violent changes are more suited for writing stories about than gradual non-violent changes. I’m not saying gradual non-violent changes is what US needs right now, but your statement is false and I think you should stop instigating violence in this thread.

5 million people are doing something, your comment is shitting on their effort.

there’s also immense value is reminding people that they’re not as singular in their viewpoint as they feel.

This destroys the narrative of the protested party. They cannot convincingly talk about ‘a few misguided people disagreeing’ when you see so many others who feel like you. Even if nothing would be achieved by the protest, this is an immensely powerful confirmation of an individuals beliefs. 100% agree.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Health officials want you to think twice before buying one of those brightly colored little bottles often sold at gas stations, convenience stores and smoke shops.

Sometimes called “gas station heroin,” the products are usually marketed as energy shots or cognitive supplements but actually contain tianeptine, an unapproved drug that can be addictive and carries risks of serious side effects.

U.S. poison control centers have reported a steady rise in calls linked to the drug for more than a decade. And last month the Food and Drug Administration sent a warning to health professionals about “the magnitude of the underlying danger or these products.”

Real headline: White House slams ‘utter failure’ of anti-Trump protests as America celebrates Army’s historic milestone

The defendants story makes up for it

A lot of advertising is annoying and misleading, even good advertising can lead to people buying stuff they don’t need. I am definitely not pro-advertising but it does serve more than monopolistic capitalism, especially on a more local level.

I 100% agree and totally get why I am being downvoted, but just disabling advertising or banning tracking cookies are not a magic fix to save the internet from the perspective of the companies that now show these ads. But I am definitely I favour of changes, the enshittication went way to far already. But there is more than big social media platforms is what I mean to say.

I’m not a fan of being tracked so don’t get me wrong, but without the money earned with advertising the Internet will look very different and not only in a good way.