• 0 Posts
  • 393 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 18th, 2023

help-circle






  • So I ended up reading up on the original comics because I knew they were a bit darker than the cartoons. It seems shredder is only in volume 1 of 4. In it he’s basically a New York Yakuza boss that kills splinters master. So splinter trains the turtles to kill shredder. After that he does get resurrected once, but after that he stays dead.

    Volume 2 cover a full on battle with DARPA (for experimenting on aliens and turtles), Volume 3 has a possible daughter of shredder trying to get revenge, but volume 4 retcons volume 3 and focuses on a future where aliens come to earth and the turtles can roam the streets as “aliens” (which isn’t that weird for the series as aliens first appear in volume 1).

    So, yeah, it gets kinda weird.



  • jacksilver@lemmy.worldtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldgoodbye plex
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Looks like there is a config and cache location in their docker scripts. The easiest way to make a docker application portable is to bind mount the config and cache. That way you have access to the actual files and could copy them to your windows partition.

    If you’re already using a volume for that data, I think it becomes a bit trickier. I know technically you can move or copy volumes, but I’ve never tried. Although you could still bind mount a random directory and still copy the files out.





  • jacksilver@lemmy.worldtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldDocker Backup Stratagy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Yep, bind mount the data and config directories and back those up. You can test a backup by spinning up a new container with the data/config directories.

    This is both easy and generally the recommended thing I’ve seen for many services.

    The only thing that could cause issues is breaking changes caused by the docker images themselves, but that’s an issue regardless of backup strategy.



  • Why can’t the law force websites to provide an age rating and we let parents decide what their children can see?

    Why should someone have to share government ID with a porn site?

    How does this impact social media sites like Twitter, reddit, Lemmy?

    The impacts to content hosting providers and the privacy or everyday people is negatively impacted for something parents should have more responsibility over. Not to mention the Republican justices seem to be using this to make “partially protected” language a thing, which is dangerous in itself.




  • I always thought the simplest way to do it is to pass laws that require every website to provide a rating/content description and then leave it up to the end user to set acceptable levels. We don’t get mad for kids watching the wrong content on TV.

    Websites could be fined for either not providing or providing incorrect classifications.

    If people don’t want their kids to see that stuff, make sure the parents have the tools to enforce.