znonymous [comrade/them, love/loves]@hexbear.nettoAsklemmy@lemmy.ml•How would a credibility system work…English
3·
2 months agoI have an idea. Have every single article or comment posted by a user scanned by an LLM. Prompt the LLM to identify logical fallacies in the post or comment. Post the user logical fallacies counts on a public scoreboard hosted on each federated instance. Now, ban the top 10% scoring users each quarter who have a fallacy ratio surpassing some reasonable good faith objective.
Pros: Everyone is judged by the same impassive standard.
Cons: 1) A fucking LLM has to burn coal for every stupid post we make. 2) LLM prompt injection/hijacking vulnerability.
Why does this seem to me to be like anti-Russian propaganda from some Western rag known to print lies?
Super awful and mis-carriage of justice, if true and kid just did Internet search like article says he says.
Otherwise, joining anti-state groups is risky business in any country!
Also, not to be whataboutist, but this kid is white, and the US ruins thousands of black kids’ lives every fucking year on far weaker charges.
And if the media even mentions any of it, the take is only ever: “Oh dear, whatever is to be done?”
Furthermore, it really does sound like what the US actually did to Julian Assange.