Why isn’t this a popular thing?

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I honestly didn’t have to check and see if this was a copy/paste of your previous comment.

      Get it? Because you said “I honestly had to check…” Yes, we all know you have a terrible memory, from you writing a reply by writing one of my lines, then one of yours, then one of mine.

      All while refusing to touch on what “arbitrary” means and why time-keeping systems aren’t arbitrary. They’re pretty much the exact opposite. Hell “like clock-work” and other such expressions have pretty much the exact opposite meaning to “arbitrary.” :D

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        K. 👍

        (whoa, I haven’t been reading any of your responses, but this one is longer than usual. You must be getting mad, eh?) (don’t bother replying, I’m not reading it)

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I know you have memory issues, but like a week ago when you were lying about “having read a book about timekeeping”, I told you what a horrible liar you are.

          You haven’t gotten any better.

          You’re just seething that you were wrong. That’s why you have to keep spamming. Because you’re seething that I am right and you are wrong and timekeeping systems are most definitely not arbitrary.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Yeah, you don’t seem mad at all, spamming “k” like a tweener.

              Must be really maddening to have someone teach you how to use your native language, huh?

              Must feel completely arbitrary. That’s what the word means right? Whatever I want it to? Oh no, right, no, that’s not how words work.