I could have titled this as just waste created by living daily, but wanted to focus it down a little more. I feel kind of like im the crazy one that sees this insane waste when eating at restaurants, wrappers, cups, drink carriers going right in the trash, billions per day. Its insanity if you think about it.

I’ve at least been never using cup lids or straws and never taking drink carriers when theyre offered (what a massive waste of cardboard!). Then most of the waste is at least paper from the bag and wrapper. Still not great. And yes, I know the solution would be “cook at home!” But that also wastes a lot of freshwater from dish washing, and sometimes it’s just nice to eat somewhere else.

I wonder if this is just something you notice as you get older. Then again older peiple probably waste the most, but I’m just guessing.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I just wanted to mention that using some water to wash dishes isn’t wasteful at all. Also a dish washer uses much less water than you’d think.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You’re talking about fast food. And even them are slowly (very slowly) moving toward reusable/washable stuff.

    Some fast food, if eating there (not to-go) have limited waste, as far as the customer side is concerned. Actual restaurants, aside from straws everything’s reusable. And they’re probably a bit more efficient than cooking at home, too.

    It might just be a case of stopping supporting places that are not moving in line with the time.

  • zlatiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    …are we describing the same restaurants? Unironically all the restaurants I go to generate less waste than me cooking at home lol…

    As in, every time I go to a restaurant they would always bring in washable dishes/utensils, and I assume they would probably have to fill the dishwashers to the brim (in contrast to me living alone & only filling up half each time). The one time I ordered a takeout, the restaurant put all the food in insanely high-quality takeout boxes that were freezer and microwave friendly, I used them for meal prep for a full year…

    Granted these are fine dining and all cost a fortune. I guess fast food/takeouts do describe that a bit better

    • TheWilliamist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It should be noted that “microwave safe” containers are not necessarily food safe. It literally means they will not melt or warp the microwave.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sounds like you’re describing fast food rather than restaurants. Going out to eat, for me, is going to a restaurant. I don’t consider that super wasteful. Restaurants use washable plates and silverware. The travel with the vehicle is wasteful. But it’s not especially wasteful.

    Yes. Fast food is super wasteful. Especially if you’re in a region that still uses styrofoam. But it’s probably less wasteful than it was when any of us were children.

    • Delvin4519@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The travel with the vehicle is wasteful.

      Not if you live in a real city with mass transit and use mass transit to travel to and from there. Then it no longer becomes wasteful; as the mass transit would have been running, regardless if you decided to travel to a restaurant using mass transit, or not.

  • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean I get where you’re coming from, but if you consider the water to wash dishes wasted, I’m afraid there isn’t really any food that is not wasteful, except maybe berries straight from the bush…

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I just drop down on a deer from a tree, eat its liver, and lick the blood off my knife.

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You better eat the whole deer. If you leave the hooves behind, that’s too wasteful.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Damn rights, need those for glue. You leave the hooves alone, they’re mine.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve at least been never using cup lids or straws and never taking drink carriers when [they’re] offered (what a massive waste of cardboard!).

    1. lids and straws are absolutely insignificant against the whole.
    2. cardboard drink carriers use a rougher kind of cardboard without dyes or wax or plastic, and it’s on the end of the spectrum with the least impact to the environment.

    …the bag and wrapper.

    You may have picked a class of restaurant that produces the most hard-to-biodegrade waste, and I’m not sure it’s proper to paint an entire industry based on its worst members. It’s like the sub-prime mortgage crisis but for restaurant and waste.

    “cook at home!”

    I’m not sure you’re comparing two values with the same magnitude.

    I wonder if this is just something you notice as you get older.

    Your writing suggests a member of a cohort that isn’t even close to getting ‘older’. As an American Millennial, in a country with a rapidly-declining life expectancy, growing old may not be a valid concern.

    peiple

    A hat on a hat.

  • dil@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Rich ppl prob create that much waste casually just eating at home idrc about what working class ppl do

  • psion1369@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you think what you have to throw out as the consumer is wasteful, take a look in the kitchens of these places and tell me that it’s any better. Most foods that have to be prepped in advance must be separated by single-use parchment/wax paper, then wrapped in plastic. When ready to use, use a glove for a few uses to take the prepped food out of the wrap, remove the paper separating it all, and chuck it out. It could have been prepped a week ago, or only two hours ago for fresh use, you still throw out all this paper and plastic wrapping. And then the cleaning, there is an inexcusable amount of paper towel used for various purposes, from drying your hands to wiping a counter/table, etc. And it’s all thrown out. Some restaurants will use towels and kitchen rags, but then you have so many to wash and clean, it’s usually done by a third-party service that has to drive to pick it all up, drive to a central laundry stop, do the laundry, and then drive it all back to get done again. And if you are in a place that has a washing machine in-house, it’s a drop in the bucket in solving real waste issues.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 days ago

    But that also wastes a lot of freshwater from dish washing

    I’m going to pick on this one point. A high end dishwasher appliance only use 2.4 gallons (9L) of fresh water, while even average dishwashers use about 5 to 6 gallons. To put that in perspective an 8 minute shower likely uses 17 gallons.

    So dishwashing is a tiny tiny waste, if you can even call it a waste.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Another point of (minor) contention for me is the fact that fresh water isn’t a limited resource in many parts of the world. Sure, some places it is, but a default of needing to save on water seems like a very limited frame of mind in the same way one shouldn’t assume everywhere needs to focus on retaining building heat by recycling waste heat.

    • AugustWest@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I agree dishwashers are efficient. It also sounds like you are talking about a home model. A commercial model in a kitchen is about 2 to 4 times more efficient. We are talking like maybe a gallon per 100 dishes kind of thing.

    • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Your point is spot-on. Fully agreed: modern dishwashers are way more energy- and water-efficient than manually washing dishes. Like at least an order of magnitude.

      I personally struggle with this one for different reasons. Energy and water consumption are a very tight concern since I live on a sailboat. I can’t just crank the tap to get more water. Marine health is also a concern since, ya know, it’s all around me, and I eat some of these critters around my boat. Surfactants in detergent are deeply problematic in the environment and are not removed by most wastewater treatment. Moreover, surfactants impede wastewater treatment because of the emulsification interfere with aerobic treatment (Poland seems to be actively working on the problem). FWIW, manual dish detergent also has surfactants, especially SDS/SLS, so manual washing is not a panacea.

      I don’t think there is a “right” answer to be had. But it sticks in my craw both ways.

  • Kennystillalive@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 days ago

    You had me until “wastes a lot of freshwater from dishwashing” now you are just picking things to get mad about.

    Yes I agree, eating out, specially fastfood is super wastefull for no reason at all.

    Generally there should be more products offered as unpacked versions: where you can bring your own conatiner and fill out the things you need at the store and pay in kilos / litres and not in pieces. Unfortunately we are not there yet.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not so sure eating out a restaurant that doesn’t use disposable utensils/dishes is really wasteful at all. The only difference i can think of is if you drove a long distance to get there. But it might actually be more efficient from an energy consumption perspective. You might have to heat up your oven just for a meal for a few people but they are going be cooking up a lot of stuff at once. I’d say the much bigger factors are a) are you wasting good and b) what kind of food are you eating.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        All of the packaging needed for a lot of food at home as well, I feel like restaurants probably throw away less packaging comparatively with how much they get in bulk.

        All of the plastic bottles for sauces, plastic containers for spices, meat and certain produce items that come packaged in plastic and styrofoam, plastic bags for bread and rice and pasta and junk food. Frozen items packaged in plastic in boxes that took energy to keep frozen before we spend energy to heat them within a minute or two, just because we’re too lazy to cook today.

        Not to say that restaurants waste no packaging, but they’d use less given the volume of supplies they source, and likely prepare more in-house rather than buying pre-prepared.

        I’d say restaurants are probably way more efficient in terms of waste and energy consumption than the average household. Cooking in bulk for a lot of people is better than a lot of people individually cooking for themselves.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      In Canada we have this thing called “bulk barn” (a brand of bulk food stores) that you pay by weight, as much or as little as you want, but you put each item you get into its own plastic bag.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can bring your own containers. They will tare them (ie weigh them and mark them with their mass) and then you can fill them as much or little as you like. On Sundays, you get an extra discount for bringing your own containers.

  • bieren@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    My issue with eating out is more the cost than the waste. Both are ridiculous though.

  • philpo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Funny enough,you produce far more waste and environmental impact if you cook alone or for a small household.

    From an environmental perspective a communal cafeteria with set times is actually king.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do you have a source on that, I know a saw a source a while ago showing that meal delivery service generate less waste due to less food waste than grocery stores have. But in my experience reastaurants have a ton of food waste

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I feel like using that statistic is misleading in terms of efficiency just from the factor of “gallons of gas per pound of food transported”.

        Sure there’s spoilage from product going bad, but marginal efficiency gains there are so far down the list of things to worry about that they’re not really worth going into. The reason people don’t have food isn’t because enough isn’t produced, it’s because they’re not allowed to have it because they don’t have enough money. Less food spoiling doesn’t fix that problem.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Are you referring mainly to fast food places or is it like that even at regular restaurants where you live? If I go to my local pizzeria or really any restaurant that isn’t a fast food chain, there won’t be any wrappers, single use cups or anything like that. Food will be served on plates with metal cutlery, drinks in drinking glasses etc. About the only single-use thing would be napkins I guess.

    • subignition@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      wrappers, cups, drink carriers

      Very high chance they are referring mainly to fast food.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It seems like they’re not even aware of the existence of restaurants that aren’t fast food.

  • cattywampas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    And yes, I know the solution would be “cook at home!” But that also wastes a lot of freshwater from dish washing

    I don’t think this is a good point. Just by living you’re going to be using resources of some kind, it’s simply unavoidable. I would worry less about trying to consume zero resources and more about particularly harmful things, like single-use plastics. Especially since fresh water is not an issue in some places, like where I am.

    Honestly, if you’re going to a table service restaurant, it might be even better than eating at home. You’re not going to get much plastic waste from single use items like you would with fast food, and because of the scale of the operation I could believe that restaurants are creating less waste per meal than individuals cooking at home. Think of a case of chicken breast versus individually packaged ones and the amount of plastic each uses, for example.