The majority of U.S. adults don’t believe the benefits of artificial intelligence outweigh the risks, according to a new Mitre-Harris Poll released Tuesday.

  • j677XZ@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand why people don’t have the fantasy imagine all the possibilities in which AI can help us progress from the absolutely dismal state of the world we live in currently. Yes there are risks but I just want technology to progress desperately even if I myself live somewhat comfortably for now.

    • IHawkMike@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      My concern is that the people that already own everything today will capture all of the new value created by AI + automation and the rift of inequality will only deepen.

      Guillotines aren’t as effective when they have AI-controlled assault drones.

      • mob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t imagine AI controlled assault drones would help rich people at all. If that was a fear, wouldn’t the same fear be around since the invention of tanks or any military advancement?

        Some private citizen starts using attack drones, I don’t think it will work out well in most countries. Even if the government didn’t intervene, which it would immediately

        • no surprises@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I can’t imagine AI controlled assault drones would help rich people at all.

          Rich people sell them. Armies benefit from AI-controlled drones, because they can be extremely precise, hit moving targets and don’t care about connection interference if brains are on board.

          • mob@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I guess profiting from them, yeah. Guess I was speaking in the OP context as a response to a guillotine

    • no surprises@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand why people don’t have the fantasy imagine all the possibilities in which AI can help us progress from the absolutely dismal state of the world we live in currently.

      Because one of the primal functions of our brains is to protect us from threats. These people live today. If history teaches us anything, it’s that such inventions benefit elites and it takes years of active civil work to fight back.

      AI can help us save many problems, but risks are there. It doesn’t help that politicians have no idea how to regulate AI properly.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Whenever there is something smarter, it’s always a unique one-of that can’t be replicated.

        EMH mark 1. They duplicated it and used it for cheap, menial labor. Despite the fact that it was capable of real intelligence (see The Doctor). It didn’t dive deeper than that; it was literally the ending scene to a single episode that simply left the audience thinking about the implications, as well as showing a possible start to an uprising.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even sci-fi has a hard time figuring that out.

        Science fiction just is about entertainment. An AI that’s all but invisible and causes no problems isn’t really a character worth exploring.