• Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember when Y2K was going to potentially end the world, but it didn’t thanks to experts working 'round the clock?

    Remember when corporations turned around and got pissy because Y2K was successfully avoided, claiming that it was all a big hoax?

    Remember how it’s now taught in some places that Y2K was a hoax and you can’t trust experts?

    No wonder the world struggled with COVID.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. I can see the same thing happening with climate change; say we successfully avert it, you’ll have all the lunatics on saying, “see?? There was nothing to worry about, we stressed and struggled for nothing!!1!”

      • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s the one thing we can’t avert, only adapt to and mitigate. The time to avert was half a century earlier.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same thing with the hole in the Ozone layer. People think it was never a problem because we don’t hear about it anymore, not realizing the issue has been mitigated and is recovering as we took concerted efforts to understand the cause and fix it before it became a disastrous situation.

      Fun fact, pandemics can be addressed in a similar manner. With plenty of resources and scientific collaboration, potential pandemics can be identified, risks and remedies can be researched, and then policies can be put into place to prevent them from rising to the level of a pandemic in the first place. The problem is that people generally don’t see that a pandemic was prevented, only when they fail to be prevented. Also preventing them takes money, and requires policies that can temporarily negatively affect economies. Those things are mortal sins to conservatives and libertarians. So they dismantle programs that already exist or cut their funding to make them as useless as they believe them to be. Then the worst happens and they get to point at the program that failed and use that to justify never spending money on it again. Yaaaaaaaaay!