• bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Works created by the U.S. government to not benefit from copyright protection.

      I don’t believe either the government in general or congress in specific have the blanket ability to ignore copyrights held by others.

      • Hugin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s stuff created by the government however there are also fair use provisions carved out for the government. I’ve had military guys claim the govt has complete fair use which I doubt.

        I know congress can ignore copyright for debate and argument. So a member of congress pass around copies of material to other members of congress regardless of copyright.

        I’m also pretty sure the government can’t legally start streaming all the Disney movies to federal employees without permission. I’m not sure where the line between these twoexamples is however.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        This is because works created by the government used tax money to pay for it; meaning it belongs to everyone who pays taxes. This is why american video games don’t need special permission to use US military hardware names or depictions, but would have to pay royalties for using brands like Winchester, H&K, or Fabrique Nationale.

  • floo@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    How on earth did it take so long? I’ve been copystruck by these assholes at least three or four dozen times in the 30 years I’ve been pirating … Stuff.

      • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 minutes ago

        Imperialism is a strong noun. Sure they’ve benefited greatly off the back of US imperialism, but Jesus, condemn us all. It’s not like they didn’t write “Disposable Heros” or “One.” Sure they can be litigious twats, but saying they’re pro imperialism is peak brain rot.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Owning the rights to copy and distribute your own creative works = imperialism

        • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Rofl. Imagine thinking I called out Metallica for taking down Napster alone.

          Their shit’s been used in DoD/weapons-contractor videos for decades, and the moment the MAGAts start to turn on Trump over the Epstien stuff, Metallica is suddenly anti-drone, for the first time ever.

          Next you’ll tell us NASCAR brought down the Berlin Wall.

        • floo@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          No, but when it came time for them to stand up for their rights, they were total dicks about it. There was a right way to handle the situation, but they chose the wrong way.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Policing the speech of other people = authoritarianism, yes.

          Copyright is a government-granted (and enforced) monopoly. Under anarchy, no one would benefit from copyright protection, at least not the same way we have it now.

          People could voluntarily police their own speech to stay in an association… but I don’t know how/if that would scale.

  • Sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    10 hours ago

    When reached for comment, James Hetfield responded, “YEAH-YEAAAAH, WHOA.”

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Good! Fuck letting Nazis appropriate anything into their culture of bigotry and hate.

        • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 minutes ago

          There ain’t shit. These fools are just lying. Don’t forget “Disposable Heros” or “One.” They’ve expressed their views on the military using their music in a negative way. This is from before the culture wars of 2015 began.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          i’m trying to find a link after the other poster asked it but they’ve been far more supportive of israel than is appropriate

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Their whole schtick is being as unlikable as possible, not sure why anyone would be surprised.