im so sick of seeing reports regarding men posting in women-only communities and i cant help but get annoyed with these guys.

the rules are clearly presented. either youre not paying attention or youre just an asshole who purposefully throws their opinion in a place explicitly not wanting it.

what the fuck is wrong with you guys?

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “Cite sources of your claim, prove it, and spend ages providing material that I will dismiss as irrelevant!”.

    The name comes from this comic:

    Sparrohawcs explanation is also a pretty good one.

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Cite sources of your claim, prove it, and spend ages providing material that I will dismiss as irrelevant!

      That just seems like an objection whiners raise when they dislike challenges: they

      • find the burden of supporting their argument coherently too taxing or
      • don’t know how to resolve mutually accepted premises or
      • don’t like assumptions questioned.

      No one needs to answer challenges to their argument or “spend ages providing material”. By that same token, no one else needs to care about a weak, poorly defended argument.

      It’s easy enough to ignore or reciprocate preposterous lines of questioning: seems like a skills issue.

      As for “sowing discord”, there’s a strong philosophical tradition of doing pretty much that (ie, shamelessly, impudently breaking conformity to unchallenged conventions & assumptions) to dispel “false belief, mindlessness, folly, and conceit” in the pursuit of “mental clarity or lucidity”. They were called dogs & would even state “other dogs bite their enemies, I bite my friends to save them”. Such classical philosophers might be called trolls nowadays.

      Any system that treats them as trolls is broken in my opinion.