HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoWhat number is supposed to be here?lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1134arrow-down19
arrow-up1125arrow-down1external-linkWhat number is supposed to be here?lemmy.worldHonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square75fedilink
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·15 hours agoThe top left and bottom right dots should line up entirely but it’s a misprint so I don’t think an eight can be discounted entirely: (I used a rectangle to overlay to show the alignment against a known straight line)
minus-squareZwuzelmaus@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 hours ago but it’s a misprint so I don’t think OK so we need to align assumptions :-) I am going with the assumption that an unknown amount is missing, but these dots that we can see are all in their correct places. If you want to assume that the dots that we can see may be wrong, then I won’t discuss your conclusions any further.
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·11 hours agoThey’re within the margin of error to be aligned as an eight but I dunno, maybe take this post a little less seriously and go outside? Yeesh.
The top left and bottom right dots should line up entirely but it’s a misprint so I don’t think an eight can be discounted entirely:
(I used a rectangle to overlay to show the alignment against a known straight line)
OK so we need to align assumptions :-)
I am going with the assumption that an unknown amount is missing, but these dots that we can see are all in their correct places.
If you want to assume that the dots that we can see may be wrong, then I won’t discuss your conclusions any further.
They’re within the margin of error to be aligned as an eight but I dunno, maybe take this post a little less seriously and go outside? Yeesh.