• obbeel@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    And some people think Brazil is being extreme on putting fines for X (Twitter) to pay for not blocking some accounts.

    This guy is accused of being accomplice to crime just for creating and maintaining the platform where criminals do their dealings.

    The road is downhill, my friends.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If somebody runs a market hall and allows stalls to be set up where narcotics and CSAM is being sold, and profits from it, and ignores police requests to stop it, I would like something to happen against that person. That person is complicit.

      What I can’t understand is why telegram doesn’t just set up the some moderation systems. Most of their growth surely doesn’t come from drug dealers and pederasts? It feels like it would be a tiny element of it and not worth the hassle.

      I suspect Durov doesn’t like dealing with big teams and can’t be bothered.

      I’m a heavy user of Telegram (average about 1h of screen time every day, and pay for Telegram Premium) entirely because all my friends are on it and that’s because it is the best messaging client BY FAR. I’d love not to share this platform with criminals.

      Since when did fighting crime become a “totalitarian state” thing to do?