Please don’t think I’m here to complain about rizz or skibidi toilet etc. Thats all fine by me.

The term I dislike strongly is ‘eeeh’ before you make a statement disagreeing with someone. (This is over text only). Now maybe I’ve been pavloved bc it’s always used by someone disagreeing. But I’m happy with people disagreeing with me normally its just the ‘eeeh’ or ‘erm’ that annoys me.

So what’s a random term that annoys you?

PS. Saying “eeeh actually ‘eeh’ is a perfectly fine term” would be a ridiculously easy joke and I will judge you for making it. And I know atleast one person will. Especially bow that I’ve said all this.

  • CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 months ago

    Especially in news headlines: slams, blasts, mind-blowing, hack (or lifehack)

    I’m sure there are others, but that’s all my brain can handle at the moment.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Ding ding ding!” When someone agrees with something you wrote, but wants to make sure that you know that they already knew and claim ownership of the statement that you wrote. Condesending asshole. I did not arrive at your opinion late.

    “Meanwhile” in cooking recipes. Just no. I am following a recipe in stepwise order. You do not get to tell me what I should have already done in the previous step.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      The entire way recipes are written is trash.

      “Add the flour and stir gently”: How much flour? Why do I have to scroll back up to check?!

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        It makes sense to have the ingredients first for making a shopping list and prepping. However, I do agree, with recipes being online, it should be a small task to include the quantity in the description too, even if it is adjustable for different servings.

          • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            As much as I despise the fat-tongued mockney, Jamie Oliver’s website is the only one I’ve seen that has the ingredients and method on two tabs so you can flick between them

            Dunno why they’re not all like that

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Normally, portioning out the ingredients would be the first step of the process and is all done at once.

        • SatyrSack@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Probably not normally, but ideally. I doubt mise en place is all that common in most homes.

            • howrar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I bake quite a bit and I don’t do my mise-en-place either when it comes to baking, but that’s not a problem. The way recipes are formatted works well for my process as well. I read through the steps ahead of time if it’s a recipe I am unfamiliar with, then I’ll just have the ingredients list open while I’m doing the prep. The things I make are pretty basic (cookies, cakes, muffin, etc) and the steps are all identical. Mix wet, mix dry, mix everything, bake.

              I personally find that having less repeated information makes things easier and faster to read. The recipe says “add flour”, you know that it’s all the flour. If the recipe says “add flour (1 cup)”, then I have to check back in the ingredients list to figure out if that’s all the flour or only part of it. Then the more info you add to clarify, the harder it is to skim while you’re cooking.

              • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I agree that many recipes are poorly written. Especially non professional stuff from the web.

                Still, I’d hate to prepare anything without having weighed all my ingredients beforehand.

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    Someone could take all the answers here and create a copypasta equivalent of fingernails on a chalkboard.

  • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    I cringe so hard at the twitterist carebear-hugbox way of smugly claiming the intellectual high ground and shaming somebody:

    “Be better.” or “Do better.”

    The sentiment isn’t terrible, but it’s prevalent use is obviously just dripping with arrogance and thrown out in the most petty ways. Ugh!

  • Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    Mama, momma, mommas…

    “Hey Facebook mommas, I’ve got a question about…”

    I don’t know why, but it annoys the shit out of me.

    • Uli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Similarly, not a fan of when teachers and parents talk about their “kiddos.”

      Feels like they’re needlessly using a more playful childish term to make themselves part of a separate “in group” who “gets it.”

      • Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I hadn’t thought about that one. I occasionally use the word kiddo, but only to say, “hey kiddo!” I never use it to talk about my kids, like “we took the kiddos to the park yesterday.”

        • Uli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah, it’s specifically the not talking to a kid version that bothers me.

          I pick up a subtext of self-importance and I think that’s what I find irksome. A mom is a parent. A momma is a special parent who will do anything for their baby, you’d better watch out. A kid is a child. A kiddo is a specific child who has a close bond with their momma or teacher that you wouldn’t understand. That’s the vibe I get.

      • Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t think it’s some latent psychological issue. I get along great with my mom, and I’ve never felt any resentment toward her. I’m also not bothered by words like mom, moms, mother, etc. I don’t even mind when my sons call my wife “mommy.” It’s just that one word, “momma,” that bugs me. I wish I had an explanation.

    • Stepos Venzny@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t mind people using “literally” to refer to things that they don’t literally mean because that’s just perfectly normal exaggeration.

      What I hate is that the dictionary definition changed to formalize the nonliteral meaning as a literal meaning.

    • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I literally could not care less about literally. MANY words over time end up meaning the opposite of what they did, its just the nature of how humans use language. I love that we’ve seen this change happen right in front of us.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      That never bothered me all too much. Then yesterday i watched a video on youtube to kinda doze off. Dude made some insane stuff in Minecraft. Now i usually don’t really watch these videos or Minecraft videos in general. But the production value, time and effort that went into it was beyond everything i have seen so far. The usage of the word literally kept me awake. Every time i had to flinch and at some point i had to turn it off, despite my interest.

    • Alice@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thought “I could care less” was a sarcastic way of saying “I couldn’t care less”.

    • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You could remove 99.9% of instances of “literally” and it wouldn’t change the meaning of the sentence at all. It’s just like “um” by now.

  • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    “It is what it is”

    I get the sentiment behind it, it’s just usually so defeatist/dismissive of a situation to me.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s now how people in my subculture use it.

      They use it to mean “it’s too late to avoid this problem; let’s talk about things we can change at this point”.

      Example:

      “If you hadn’t stopped at that rest area the killer never would have slashed our tires”

      “Well if you hadn’t jumped for those cheap tires maybe he wouldn’t have been able to slash them with a butter knife”

      “And if you’d paid for the triple A we’d have a ride by now”

      “Look, it is what it is. Let’s just figure out a way to get back to town without having to follow the road”

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    Places using “gluten-friendly” to mean “gluten-free”. I am gluten-UNfriendly. I do not want gluten. They’ve tried to be cute and actually managed to make the term mean the opposite of what it’s supposed to.

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    i know i’m being a nerd but i despise the term ‘taxpayer funds’/‘taxpayer money’. besides being completely wrong in nearly all cases, it places taxes above the people, above labor.

    ‘American taxpayer is paying for the genocide in Gaza’. No, every person/entity using U.S. Dollars is paying for it. Even foreign countries are indirectly paying for it.

  • kubok@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    No, you don’t have a “challenge” for me. You have a problem and are trying to make it mine.