• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hope they are too, but they’re definitely not. They’re gonna nationally ban abortion, amongst many other things. If anyone thinks otherwise, they’re kidding themselves.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      I like to imagine that there would be uprisings, like the kind with molotovs, if a national abortion ban was passed, but I think the not-right is too disorganized. It’s all very handmaids tale.

      And aside from infighting, there’s a lot of people clinging to “we should follow the rules.” Rules don’t mean much if only one faction is following them.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        And aside from infighting, there’s a lot of people clinging to “we should follow the rules.”

        Moderates have always been the allies of fascists.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      i’m crossing my fingers for another repeat of speaker of the house voting; but for the next 4 years.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They will probably at least slow themselves down at minimum, though and that will matter. Their majority is already narrow and there are good odds of cutting into that majority further or potentially even flipping the house if we’re very lucky. They had house speakership fights for a while in 2022 with a narrow majority

      They are already having some signs of potential infighting in the senate where some Republicans are trying to claim McConnell is holding a “coup” against trump by having earlier senate leader elections (McConnel is not running for senate majority leader so it’s a bit more competitive)

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        At this point, honestly, I’m just maintaining my sanity by assuming the worst so that anything that goes even slightly less awful than the worst case makes me a little bit happier.

        Not feeling very happy so far.

        • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          We have avoided some of the worst case this election. Down ballot dems have done a lot better than for president and that’s going to matter to keep them from being able to do anything without infighting fears. We could’ve been looking at a 57-43 senate should the swing states not have largely split their votes between senate and president. Instead we’re likely looking at a 53-47 or 52-48 senate.* The house could’ve also been worse too.

          In state legislatures, dems did fairly well all things considered. State legislatures are the place that resistance to Trump is most likely to really be effective. We’ve managed to keep a lot of state legislature seats and even flip some in other areas. For instance, we broke up North Carolina’s republican super majority for instance which means the Democratic governor-elect can have effective vetos. We kept the 1 seat majority in the PA state house in a funny way of having two seats flipped in opposite directions and canceling each other out


          *The Associated Press has called PA for McCormick, but Decision Desk actually thinks that Casey has a ~66% chance of winning still and neither campaign has conceded. McCormick is saying he thinks the call was incorrect and thinks things will could actually flip with the last 100,000 or so votes left to count and or may go to recount

          EDIT: and to add on for further context, Decision Desk is usually some of the first to call any race - to the point where some people say their calls are premature. The AP usually calls races after Decision Desk. The AP usually is much more slow on their calls which is why this situation is so strange where the AP has called it but Decision Desk hasn’t and thinks it actually has 2/3 odds of going the opposite way that the AP called it

        • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Separate from the Dems, but The Lincoln Project did run some ads aimed literally just at Trump to make him angry at his campaign staff. Here’s one example that ran on Fox News during the hours that Trump was most likely to watch it. The Trump campaign ended up sending a cease and desist over it