• Calcifer@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    27 days ago

    “A computer can never be held accountable - therefore a computer must never make a management decision”. - IBM Training manual, 1979.

    So jazzed to live here in the future where we have AI making insurance denials and deciding drone targets! /s

    Good on her for standing against the Silicon Valley doom hype machine.

  • Kane@femboys.biz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    This is the primary reason I’ve not given agents more power than something extremely controlled (I.e. only a function to turn on/off the lights). As I was always concerned that these generational models might accidentally do something dumb or annoying, let alone something that might be illegal or harmful.

    I don’t really see how anyone would ask AI to complete something completely autonomously at this stage, without oversight.

    • Fart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Good for image classification and tagging to automate sorting all the images off my phone. Some fun chatbots to soundboard ideas off. Anything involving credit cards, bank details, personal info near the internet? That’s a big nope.

  • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    There are some things it would be nice to have a brain in a jar to do for me.

    I do not, however, want that jar sitting in an Amazon-owned server room somewhere, where they can modify the jar to change how the brain works.


    Take back your brain-in-a-jars from big tech! /j

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    It will be interesting tracing accountability when AI does something less than legal while trying to implement a legal command.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    AI autoresponders are developing into artificial personas that interact with the world on our behalf, which we won’t even pay attention to until the police show up because one of them threatened to assassinate the president or something, and we’ll say, “That wasn’t me,” and they’ll be like yuh-huh it was.

  • geography082@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    Why Signal is not in f-droid? Is there a statement from them about it? What I know is only in Google store . And talking to much about privacy and not being in a f-droid repo, is ironic

    • ruplicant@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      actually, years ago there was a long drawn out drama about people in Signal’s team refusing to publish on F-Droid because of “security concerns” in Moxie’s time. IIRC they worked to take down builds on the main repo

      you can probably still find the old github threads with the lenghty discussions

      • geography082@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        I didn’t know, Thanks for the info . Well nowadays f-droid is a standard for privacy . They should reconsider

  • lostbit@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    huh didn’t know she was this good looking. Also, fair points.