• Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The budget Deficit has increased under Republicans and decreased under Democrats consistently for decades.

    How you can still think Republicans save you money is beyond insane. No child left behind really did a number on the populace.

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The budget Deficit has increased under Republicans and decreased under Democrats consistently for decades.

      Trump R -$6.612 trillion

      Obama D -$6.781 trillion

      Bush R -$3.293 trillion

      Clinton D +$63 billion

      Bush R -$1.036 trillion

      Reagan R -$1.412 trillion

      Carter D -$253 billion

      Ford R -$181 billion

      Nixon R -$70 billion

      Johnson D -$36 billion

      Kennedy D -$18 billion

      Eisenhower R -$15 billion

      Truman D -$5 billion

      Roosevelt D -$194 billion

      Hoover R -$5 billion

      • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is like to point out that most of Obama’s increase in budget was pushed through under Bush (because budgets are passed the prior year). And he brought it down from that starting point over his two terms. Trump immediately jacked it back up from what he inherited, and Biden decreased it again.

        • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can make excuses for every president it’s always the guy before them, but the numbers don’t show a decline in deficit for Democrat presidents.

          • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Oh yeah, the party of fiscal responsibility who is now trying to pass a progressive 4,5 billions tax cut for the wealthiest part of society. Who knows when these missing funds for the government will show up in its administrative books???

            You must be so wise in the way of the finances, please (not) teach us master

            • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              You should probably go back and check your facts. I don’t see anything about a proposed 4.5 billion progressive tax cut.

                • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You also missed that the bill was extending tax cuts, and finally the cuts being progressive, though I suspect you don’t know what progressive tax cuts are.

                  • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    I meant progressive in a sarcastic way, implying these cuts won’t impact the middle and lower classes but only the wealthy one.

                    An extension towards fiscal responsibility!!! And beyond!!! /s (do you need the /s to understand I’m still being sarcastic with these final lines??)