. The race of a voice actor doesn’t matter

. It is possible to wear yoga pants because there comfy

. You don’t need to shower everyday

. It is possible to crossdress/be gender non-conforming without being trans

. Monty Python is very overrated

  • iddqd404@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ok, I don’t like making generalizations, but let’s play the game:

    • Dynamically typed programming languages are for babies.

    • Having depression is not being sad. Having anxiety is not being nervous. Mental health exists and it’s very complex.

    • We should start trating unhealthy use of social media as an actual addiction, and the platforms should be held accountable for the damage they have and still are causing.

    • Sometimes older people have actual knowledge and wisdom that is only gained by experiencing life, and younger people shuld learn to shut the fuck up some times and stop pretending they were born knowing everything.

  • hallettj@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Don’t say “acronym” when you mean “abbreviation”!

    “Acronym” specifically refers to an initialism that forms a new word. For example,

    • scuba (self-contained underwater breathing apparatus)
    • NASA (pronounced like a word - you don’t say “ehn eh ess eh”).

    It’s acro- (height) -nym (word) - a word that exists on top of / above other words.

    In contrast “NIH” is not an acronym because it isn’t pronounced or read as a word. It’s appropriate to say, “‘NIH’ is an abbreviation” or “‘NIH’ is an initialism”. But saying “‘NIH’ is an acronym” is wrong!

  • gobbles_turkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Daylight savings time needs to be gotten rid of.

    The imperial measurement standard needs to be gotten rid of.

    The UN security council veto should be able to be overridden by the general assembly.

    Collective responsibility for a democracy’s crimes should be a thing.

    The country of Israel should be moved to an open area of land with no people on it. Siberia, Alaska, Greenland, or the jungles of South America.

    There should be a corporate death penalty when they commit crimes.

    All kids should have food.

    All humans should have access to very basic water and food. Like beans and rice for everyone, no exceptions.

    Basic sanitation is a human right.

    Religion should not be respected any more than any other bag of philosophical ideas. Stupid parts of religions should be called out and discussed, not hallowed and treated with respect even if its utter nonsense.

  • uuldika@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Using “themselves” for a non-binary person or unspecified gender is grammatically incorrect.

    It’s “themself.” (Unless they’re plural.)

    Also, “Latinx” is performative white ally cringe. It’s not pronounceable in Spanish. Use “Latine.” -e is the obvious gender neutral ending.

  • srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago
    • LTS Linux distros are not good for desktop usage and terrible for beginners. (And for servers too but a bit less ig).
    • The current distribution model of Linux apps is garbage. The concept of package maintainers, in most cases, is just redundant, duplicated work.
    • Bash is horrible and relying on it for anything else than personal scripts gets messy really fast.
    • Having a standard “platform” in Linux is key.
    • SystemD is actually good, not perfect but very powerful.
    • Apps not using Portals are a crime.

    Obviously written by NixOS sectarian.

  • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    We should be boycotting all art and entertainment from Big Media in its entirety, but nobody is willing to do so

  • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago
    • Pajamas shouldn’t leave the house.

    • Unique names and unique spellings of names are terrible. There should be a government approved list of names to choose from.

    • Religion is the worst thing humanity has made up.

    • Waterworld is a fantastic movie.

    • Linux > Windows.

  • BenReilly97@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    You should have to get a special license to drive something as big as a modern pickup truck.

    And you should have to have a justifiable reason to buy and own one.

    And there should be restrictions on where they can be driven.

    Basically most people shouldn’t have pickup trucks.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      I would go further. Most cars don’t belong in places where people live. They injure and kill people on the regular, the noise pollution causes mental and physical health problems, the light pollution disrupts sleep, the particulate pollution causes cardiovascular disease and dementia, as well as damaging ecosystems, driving adds to obesity and issues related to a sedentary lifestyle, the physical space they take leads to sprawl and ecosystem destruction, and the sprawl also bankrupts cities and towns. As well, driving in traffic just plain sucks as an activity, and makes people angry and miserable.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 days ago

        Oh yeah. Cars are bad on like every metric.

        Socially they isolate people. You don’t interact with anyone when you’re driving except to get angry. The micro interactions you have on the train matter. Seeing people that aren’t just like you, also annoyed that the train is delayed, or just having a nice time with their kids, matters. More than makes up for when other people are annoying.

        Economically they hurt. It’s much harder to just pop into an interesting looking shop when you’re cruising along at 40mph. All the space dedicated to parking could be used for other stuff- housing, commerce, communal space, whatever.

        They make spaces less safe. Other than the direct impact (no pun intended) of people getting hit by cars, or crashing into stuff, a space that has steady foot traffic is generally safer. If everyone was in their car instead, you’d probably be alone on foot with no one to help if something happened.

        They’re bad for the environment. Air pollution, micro plastics, whatever.

        Drunk driving is way more dangerous than drunk “riding the train”.

        The more non-car options are built out, the better it will be for people who need to drive for whatever reason.

        Cars culture is trash and if we ever escape from it, it’s going to take years.

        • NKBTN@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Going to disagree with your second point. In the UK at least, there’s a lot of friendly “no, after you” type activity. If the road narrows due to an overhead railway bridge or parked cars etc. generally speaking one or both will pull over, flash their lights to signal the other one can go first, and get a friendly wave of thanks when they pass. Letting people in at junctions isn’t uncommon either, though tends to be more the exception than the rule.

          There is anger too of course, but usually only aimed at people who aren’t following the rules of the road, have done something stupid/dangerous, or are hesitating for far too long.

    • Thebigguy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 days ago

      The only reason Americans started buying pick up trucks on mass is because of Tarifs put on Japanese car manufacturers in the 1970s and pick up trucks had no taxes on them suddenly became one of the cheapest and more affordable cars in the United States. Rick Wolf explained this somewhere I can’t remember where exactly.

      • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        It was on Volkswagen Transporter pick ups in the 1960s, in response to German taxes on imported US chicken.

        Actually, full sized pick ups are not liable to light truck tariffs, but they have no market outside of the US.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 days ago

        There were also reduced fuel economy requirements for trucks and off-road vehicles, which contributed to the rise of SUVs.

      • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Love how the bed of the truck is basically the same size (if not smaller) as well so really you can’t use the excuse of needing the bigger truck for hauling stuff.

    • Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Id love a pickup…but it would be impractical, expensive to buy and run, the back space is basically useless cause even if you do put a cover on, the locks are crap. So I won’t be getting a pick up truck. Plus, where I live, it would go missing.

      • Thebigguy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        I‘d love to move to India again. I just don’t know how I could get a job there. I don’t have any fancy degrees.

    • gwilikers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Its even worse in SEA. Some countries like Nam have these small dick pick-up driving shitheads but what they don’t have is America’s huge roads and streets.

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Agree, as a further measure It should be criminal to name stuff with “the” to begin with.

    • Gismonda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      This seemingly simple thing enrages me on a daily basis.

      How difficult can it fucking be to write some damn code to omit “the” from sorting if it is the first word of a title? JFC

      If “the” appears first, then “ignore” must surely be a thing, right??

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      We should organize libraries not by name, or even the Dewey decimal system, but simply by title length. Fiction, non fiction, jounrla articles, doesn’t matter. It’s all just in one stupid long list, shortest title to longest title.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    If I do not have or cannot easily get root access to a computer, I don’t really own it.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        A phone is a computer. A smartwatch is a computer. The computers running a car’s infotainment and engine control systems are computers.

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    Your opinion of Monty Python is bad, and you should feel bad.

    The word Data was originally a plural word, and should be again, for all time

    • मुक्त@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 days ago

      Data is plural of datum, which also corresponds to the English word date. When Gregorian calender was introduced in Europe, for decades dates were the only things written in Indian style numerals.

      • chobeat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        datus/data means “given”, as in the metaphysical sense of the word, since the word started being used for statistics in a period where measurements were considered an objective observation of material reality, which was in fact considered “given” and not interpreted.

    • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Seconded on Monty Python - he should feel terrible about that travesty.

      Also a shower per day minimum for everyone is necessary and that’s the hill I’m dying on. Clean your stinky arse up.

      • Thebigguy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 days ago

        I just shower because I like it. A more important factor in personal hygiene is if you wash your hands or not. I see so many people who piss and shit and then just run their hands under water quickly it’s fucking gross.

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          You are vastly underestimating the social awkwardness that comes with telling someone they smell. Maybe you have a very different relationship than most do with their friends, but it would take quite a lot before I would bring that kind of thing up. In a professional setting, I would want to get HR involved before pointing that out to someone. I would let them figure out a polite way of asking the coworker to fix their B.O.

          • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            At the canteen table, I brought it up once during a tangentially-related conversation and they were all very surprised. Minutes later, while the others were getting the fill, one of them even privately went up to me and confirmed.

      • I'm_All_NEET:3@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        9 days ago

        “Seconded on Monty Python - he should feel terrible about that travesty.”

        Monty Python is for insane British “people” who think drag is the height of comedy.

        “Also a shower per day minimum for everyone is necessary and that’s the hill I’m dying on. Clean your stinky arse up.”

        Not even true. Daily showers are entirely performative. I’ll have you know there are many people in your life who don’t take showers every day and you don’t even realize.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      The word Data was originally a plural word

      and because of that its not “data is beautiful” it’s “data are beautiful”

      • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        A set of multiple things is a plural, friend. A set of dishes, a set of clothes, a set of knives, a set of tools. THESE tools, THESE clothes, THESE knives, THESE data.

    • I'm_All_NEET:3@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      “Your opinion of Monty Python is bad, and you should feel bad.”

      How? I didn’t even say it was bad just not as good as people say it is. It’s ok but it can only be random for so long. Once you’ve seen one episode you’ve seen them all. Monty Python is no different to those old asdfmovie videos.

      • AtariDump@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Once you’ve seen one [Monty Python] episode you’ve seen them all.

        Sir, these are not Big Bang theory episodes.

  • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago
    • ISO 8601 (e.g., 2025-05-23) are the only correct date formats.
    • We should stop using time zones and daylight saving.
    • wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Stop using timezones? So every day would actually be two weekdays because at some random point in time it would switch date during the day. Let’s meet next Monday wouldn’t even specify a single day anymore in most countries. And there is no real benefit to stop using timezones, just downsides. Yes you’d know which time it is anywhere but you still wouldn’t know of they are awake or not and have to either look it up or remember it - the same you have to do now.

    • pwnicholson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      9 days ago

      ISO dates, 100%.

      Time zones…I could see arguing to rework them, but abolish them? How would that even work?

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        9 days ago

        Typically people propose switching everything to UTC.

        The read this doesn’t work is because humans are still bound by a diurnal cycle and you won’t have everyone wake up at 0800, since for some people that’s the time in the middle of when the sun sets and rises.
        So you still need to communicate to people across space where the sun is or will be for you at a time in the future, or otherwise relate where in your wake cycle you’ll be.
        Tied to this is legal jurisdictions. Within a legal jurisdiction it’s important for regulatory events to be synchronized. For things like bank hours, school hours, government office hours, things like “no loud noises when people tend to be sleeping”, “teenagers old enough to have a job aren’t allowed to work late on school nights”, and what specifically constitutes “after hours or weekend labor” for the purposes of overtime and labor regulation you need your definition to be consistent across the jurisdiction. Depending on where you are in relation to Greenwich a typical workday can start at 1900 Friday night/morning, and extend until 0300 Saturday morning/afternoon. Your “weekend” would start when you woke up around 1800 Saturday evening/morning.

        Right now we solve this problem by deciding on a consistent set of numbers for where the sun is across some area that inevitably lines up with legal jurisdiction. Then we use a lookup table to translate our conception of where the sun is to where it is elsewhere.

        Without timezones you instead need to use the same type of lookup table to find the position of the sun at the time and place of interest, and then try to infer what the situation would be.

        We have UTC now, and people inevitably already use it where it makes sense. It’s just usually easier to have many clocks that follow similar rules than it is to have one clock that’s interpreted many different ways.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      We should stop using time zones

      Check this out. I’m a business with at least one office in every US state. You want to know when my New York office opens so you can come by. Instead of seeing “Offices are open 9 AM to 5 PM” You now need to check every office… by state… by city? Time zones would be helpful even if we all used GMT, so that you could easily determine which time zone a business is in to set a reasonable time to be open.

      DST can fuck off though.

      • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s a pretty specific use though. A case like this only makes sense because we all somehow decided 9AM - 5PM is a standard business time, when society could benefit from having different business/services open at different times.

        • theparadox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          That was an example of a situation where time zones make sense. Any time it is important where the sun is in the sky, the time that it occurs will differ depending on where you are in the world. When is lunch break? When do backups run? When can you see the eclipse? If we weren’t in an interconnected world, it wouldn’t matter much but we need some convention to communicate information that is dependent on where the sun is, as that very often dictates human activity.

          It seems like a universal time makes sense but I can’t think of a way to get around the fact that activity will vary according to timezones anyway.

    • AtariDump@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      We should stop using time zones…

      The way they are and divide them in half so that the western side of the current time zone gets the same-ish amount of light as the eastern side of the time zone

      … and daylight saving

      By springing ahead permanently, right? Right‽

    • Moonweedbaddegrasse@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      As a British person I agree with your second point. Everyone should use Greenwich Mean Time which is obviously the correct time. Even if it means that noon is in the middle of the night for some people.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I want the most anti-British option. I know! We’re going to do away with clocks entirely. We wake up when we wake up. We work when we work. We forget counting the days. Forget the calendar entirely. Live forever in an eternal now.