I think for me it’s alien: covenant. I was really interested in the ideas explored in prometheus and covenant just expanded on them. I don’t get much into the details of why it is or isn’t a good movie.

Luckily, though, HBO ran raised by wolves which really delved into ideals about AI and planet seeding etc. So that itch got way scratched even if the run was cut short.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Dirty Grandpa.

    It’s much funnier than it has a right to be. Also, Aubrey Plaza really, really wanted to fuck Robert De Niro, and fought to get the role for that reason. Its ending sex scene is one of the most genuine in Hollywood because of that. Of course, Aubrey Plaza makes things better just by showing up.

    Critics who hate it need to lighten up.

  • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Tommy boy got shit on by siskel and ebert, which is why I never trust their reviews. That movie is a 10.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I still think League of Extraordinary Gentlemen got unfairly dragged. 16% on Rotten Tomatoes.

      It is a pretty mediocre movie overall, but it is just a lot of fun and I have watched it a dozen times.

    • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Watched it not long ago. Didn’t realize the people rating it have no appreciation for decent movies.

      It wasn’t phenomenal by any means but it was quite entertaining for the duration of it.

    • otto@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t disagree that it’s a terrible movie, it’s just a terrible movie that I happened to really like.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Surprised it hasn’t come back as a streaming channel series of films like “Knives Out”. It’s got a lot of potential.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I remember screening league of extraordinary gentleman and all I could think is it was probably not for me. Not to say someone else wouldn’t like it. I feel like not everything should be rated based on its wide spread appeal.

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      16% on Rotten Tomatoes.

      That crictic rating though, that’s a useless measure. And 44% audience score isn’t that bad.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ebert’s big beef with it was “You can’t drive a car in Venice!” and I’m like “You’re OK with 1800s nuclear submarines, an immortal vampire victim, an invisible man, and a dude who can’t be hurt because his painting takes the damage for him, but driving a car in Venice is a bridge too far?”

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s one where I really think they missed the mark compared to the book. I thought the book was really well done, and had a great premise. Idk the movie just left a sour taste in my mouth. I highly recommend reading/listening to the book

        • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I saw somewhere on reddit recently calling the book worse than the movie. I liked the book only because I got to envision my version of all the nostalgic iconography. I’m not sure why reddit was hating.

        • jaycifer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m glad that you enjoyed it, but listening to the audiobook was one of the most aggravating reading experiences I’ve had. There were cool bits, but every chapter or two my eyes would glaze over for a minute as Wil Wheaton read off a list of things from the 80’s for a paragraph or two, interrupting whatever flow the book had going on at the time to cram ‘memberberries down my throat. I prefer the movie because I can look at the ‘memberberry references without them interrupting the other cool bits.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Lol, I really like premise too. It can be done better, tho.

        That’s why I support all sorts of sci-fi that is complete garbage. I want the genre to thrive and if we stop showing up Hollywood stops giving money.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s a work of art.

      A simple tropey story to hang some amazing visual and aural art off.

      I watch it often.

    • x4740N@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve watched it when I was younger a couple of times but for me personally it was just a movie I watched amd the idea of rewatching it feels boring to me

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Breakfast of Champions - I don’t care if it totally bastardized Vonnegut, I really liked it.

    Mystery Men - Again, I don’t care if it totally bastardized Bob Burden.

    Titan AE

    The female version of Ghostbusters.

    Zardoz.

    Hackers. Fuck you if you say one bad thing about this movie. It is glorious.

  • serfraser@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well it’s not a shit rating but I do think A Knight’s Tale is way better than its mediocre scores. Perfect comfort movie.

    • Singletona082@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      ‘but it’s not historically accurate!’

      Y’get to see heath ledger in armor win the girl, bust heads, and have a grand time doing it! All to a solid soundtrack.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        The lack of historical accuracy also isn’t due to a lack of research, but a deliberate style and tone choice, as demonstrated at the very beginning of the movie when the trumpeters play We Will Rock You and the crowd claps and stomps along.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Really, cool. I’ll have to watch it one of these days, if it ever comes up on streaming

          • Psythik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Cancel all your subscriptions and look into Stremio + Torrentio + Real-Debrid. For $3/mo you could have any show or movie you want, streamed directly to your TV, without having to wait for it to “come up on streaming”.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Tell me about it. Anybody who saw the first few minutes of the film and still expected the rest to be historicaly accurate should probably get tested for autism. The director made it clear from the very start that A Knight’s Tale is satire.

  • Odo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Kung Pow: Enter the Fist. Yes it’s utterly ridiculous. I don’t care, it’s still a masterpiece of absurdity to me. That 13% on RT is a shame.

    Also how has it been 23 years since its release.

  • What constitutes a “shit rating?”

    Big Trouble in Little China is 7.2/10 on IMDB, and it got positive reviews; it was, however, a commercial failure, making only half what it cost to produce. Great movie.

    Wizards rates only 6.3/10 on IMDB, although it did well at the box office. That may be my favorite movie of all time.

    Dredd failed at the box office but gets a 7.1 from IMDB. I think it’s grossly underrated.

    Star Trek: The Motion Picture is a 6.4 and generally gets poor reviews; it did fine at the box office. But I love that film.

    If you want you get esoteric, Lord Love a Duck (1966) was a financial failure and gets only 6.3 from IMDB, but it’s wonderful.

    Disney’s 1979 The Black Hole gets a 5.9 and didn’t do well. It’s a lot of fun and the ending is an acid trip.

    The Prophesy (1995) got really bad reviews and 46% on Rotten Tomatoes, proving there’s no accounting for taste. Absolutely worth watching.

    Hawk the Slayer (1980), 5.3, is in the “it’s so bad it’s good” category. This includes Zardoz (1974), and Krull.

    And, Dune (1984). 6.3 IMDB, total loss at the box office, and one of the best movies of all time. I kinda think Herbert might have hated it where he’d have liked 2021, but the cast, the atmosphere, the music, the hyperbolic representations of the characters; it is a masterpiece. And it features a young, mostly naked Sting (which is the lure I used to use to get my girlfriends to watch it).

    S.O.B. (1981). 6.4 IMDB, but 81% RT. Box office failure. Hilarious, and a topless Julie Andrews (sigh).

    Red Dawn (1984). 6.3/48%. Not my favorite movie, but worth a watch. Surprising decision to not utterly vilify (unhumanize) the Russian antagonists.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You just listed a bunch of great films. All of them reason to ignore the reviews and ratings. I love Big Trouble. One of Russel’s campiest and most fun films.

        • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think (my own personal opinion) is that Big Trouble in Little China did something so crazy and wacky that no one actually recognised it at the time.

          If you look at the film from a certain perspective, Jack Burton was the sidekick, and Wang was the main character. And they just filmed it from the perspective of the sidekick who thinks he’s the main character, which is a conceit I’ve always adored.

          • Excellent! I love that perspective. Seriously, it’d be a shorter film, but you could actually do a cut with Wang as the lead, and it’d work. Although, Gracey makes that a little harder; there isn’t much to work with on the Miao Yin romance angle; there are almost no scenes with her and Wang, except at the end, and she’s not a very active character.

            Regardless, that’s a great view!

    • Singletona082@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Wait what? Big trouble in little china got- Pardon I’m gonna need to process that for a moment as that’s one of the few things me and my stepdad will call time out on arguments on. It’s a great carpenter adventure movie. It’s literally a sendup of the modenr john wayne archatype. Hell, jack isn’t even stupid, he’s just, to borrow a tv tropes term, wrong genre savvy. Also I recommend the boom comics when/if you can.

      it contextualizes him refusing to kiss Grace Law at the end and… it is utter heartache in the best way.

      Dredd … needed a netflix mega city one police proceedural followup. with Urban’s Dread showing up a couple times when thigns get above everyone’s heads both to prevent his overuse and to remind everyone WHY he is feared.

      I’m gonna admit i saw the Dune novels as overrated, but i liked that the 80’s movie tried to have fun while telling the story.

      Well at the point red dawn was made, we were starting to thaw on the russians, even as Regan kept juicing the Empire of Evil rhetoric. The message ‘war destroys everyone’ is a good one.

        • It didn’t. It cost them $30-40M to make, and only grossed $41.5M at the box office. Studios don’t make sequels for break-even films.

          It got good reviews, fans liked it - even John Wagner, the guy who created the character, liked it. I don’t know why it did so poorly at the theaters.

          They filmed it in 3D, a BluRay of which I’m a proud owner, and it’s fantastic in 3D. It also explains some of the framing of many of the shots, even though (I think) they also work fine in 2D.

  • UnlovingRace@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Bladerunner 2049.

    I know a lot of people disliked it compared to the first one, even Ridley Scott himself. But I love the direction Denis Villeneuve took this film in.

    • throbbing_banjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Did people dislike it compared to the first one? It’s got an 88% on rotten tomatoes, and anyone I’ve talked with about the films prefers the second one.

      I agree with you, by the way, I just don’t think that’s the unpopular take (Ridley’s opinion is meaningless at this point).

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ridley Scott is famous for his shit opinions. When he released The Last Duel in the middle of COVID, he complained that “them kids can’t even get off their phone for 2 hours to enjoy art” as thr primary reason it wasn’t making money.

    • One of the few sequels that did credit to the original. Like the original Alien trilogy, it’s best if you consider them movies in the same universe but different genres. Like, Aliens (I) was a suspense; II was a sci-fi action; III was a horror thriller.

      Maybe the Blade Runners weren’t so very different in genre, but yeah - good sequel, and in its way faithful to the original.

  • acchariya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Maximum overdrive. 1986, coked up actors, campy as hell but taking itself very seriously, 14% rotten tomatoes score.

  • Alabaster_Mango@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Jupiter Ascending is, in my opinion, a masterpiece. Bees can sense royalty? Fantastic. The bureaucracy android having to bribe his way through the system he was literally created to navigate? Marvelous. Don’t even get me started on the air roller skates. Eddie Redmayne’s four million year old teenager was perfection too. Two volume levels: harsh whisper or screaming.

    It was marketed as some kind of amazing epic, so people approached it wrong I think. It was a Wachowski film. What were they expecting? I went in there assuming it’d be like their Speed Racer movie, but in space. I was not disappointed.

    Second vote would be for Speed Racer, lol.

  • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Dragonheart (1996)

    Godzilla (1998)

    Aeon Flux (2005)

    Next (2007) - thought it was funny

    3 Ninjas (1992) - classic

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not the worst rating at around a 60% on Rotten Tomatoes and around a 6.5 on IMBD, but I absolutely without question love An American Tail: Fievel Goes West.

    Definitely a fun “sequel” with a lighter tone than the original. Though I will definitely say the Native American mice scenes are definitely outdated and a product of their time if you ask me.