Reposting this from here from 2023, after I stumbled across it tonight and it hits hard.

The text in the image:

I love my smart TV. I love the way it takes a long time to boot up because it’s trying to refresh the advertisements on the home screen. I delight in the way it randomly restarts because it’s downloaded an update without asking me, each of which makes the TV slower and slower with every subsequent install. I adore the way it buries the apps that I want to use, and that I use without fail every single time, below the apps that it’s being paid to promote and which I have never touched in my life and would never use without the cold metal of a glock pressed hard against my sweating temple. I am infinitely thrilled by the way the interface lags constantly, due to the need to have one thousand unnecessary animations rendered on hardware ripped wholesale from a ten year old phone. I feel myself borne aloft on wings of pure joy when I am notified that my data will be collected and analysed to determine my usage patterns. Even now I am writing this from a field of beautiful flowers and soft luscious grass as I lie and look up happily at the bright blue sky, smiling happily to know that this is the future of technology

      • renard_roux@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        12 days ago

        either

        Is there any indication that they won’t implement this shit at some point?

        Also, should we be trying to come up with the most insane “features” in this vein that we can imagine (knowing full well that some corporation will come up with them eventually), and then patent them to protect humanity from them?

        Is there any organization that collects patents just to block them (in the consumer’s favor)? A kind of white-hat patent troll? And, if not, should we create one?

    • renard_roux@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 days ago

      We have a Samsung “smart” TV, hooked up to an AppleTV box. The TV’s original remote is in a drawer somewhere, forever unused.

      I have the apps that I need, the tiny Siri Remote turns on the TV and handles volume, and, apart from the aggressively, insanely, mind-blowingly horrible on-screen “keyboard” / text input (we don’t have Apple phones we can use to mitigate this, sadly. Also, what the fucking fuck, Apple?!) we’re happy. For now. I trust Apple to make the experience incrementally worse as a fact of life.

      Not perfect, but leagues better than dealing with Samsung’s interface.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    12 days ago

    I honestly wonder how hard it would be to do a full lobotomy on a smart TV and if there would be a big enough market for that kind of service.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      12 days ago

      best thing is to never hook 'em up to the internet. provided the manufacturers don’t all start requiring internet to ‘set up’ a tv.

      next best thing would be a revert of firmware or a full ‘reset’ of settings; if possible. to return it to an ‘out of box’ state–then above, never connect it to the internet.

      replacing a cheap streaming device is a hell of a lot cheaper than replacing the tv once the software gets obsoleted for whatever reason.


      my coworker (and boss, technically) just casually mentioned that her inlaws ‘updated’ their tvs when they were visting over the holidays. i cringed so fucking hard because i have the same model, just smaller–so i know what happens.

      they had just recently hooked-up wireline internet and could actually stream stuff now… so i had just given them a new streaming stick to use instead of connecting their now 3 year old tv to the wifi.

      • metaStatic@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 days ago

        You’d still have the TVs default OS running on a potato. I’m thinking more along the lines of replacing that with a bare bones old school OS that was responsive.

        • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 days ago

          True, but a 3 year old TV with original firmware would have been pre-adpocalypse. My never-connected LG boots pretty quick when it was last on an HDMI port before turning off.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        I have heard that some TVs attempt to connect to every WiFi they can find using default credentials even if you never connect it yourself

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          default credentials

          Wifi doesn’t have default credentials any more… These days, there’s legislation (at least in California) that requires default passwords to be randomly generated, but it’s recommended to have no default password at all and instead prompt the user for a password when setting up the device.

          That’s why some access points have the default password either printed on the box or on the bottom of the device.

          • adarza@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            i wonder if they were dumb enough to just use algorithms based on mac or the default ssid or something… so if you knew the scheme and knew the password composition (characters used, or wordlist, whatever), you could come up with the ‘default’ password for a wifi point.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              Companies are probably doing the easiest thing, and it seems easier to make it completely random. I can imagine something very basic like a giant spreadsheet of all the devices being produced, and running some formula to enter a random value into every cell in a particular column.

              • adarza@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                but then they have to keep that data–and you just know they keep all those passwords. (support call… q:i dunno what the password is/can’t read the sticker. a:gimme x or y off your unit, and i’ll look it up for you).

                but if they do it programmatically, all they’d need is the code to recreate any password if given the constant used to create it (the ssid or mac or sn, for instance).

                hopefully they would use something that can’t be obtained off the wifi broadcast, like the sn on the unit.

                • dan@upvote.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Hmm, yeah, good point. It could be based off a hash of the serial number or something similar.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        provided the manufacturers don’t all start requiring internet to ‘set up’ a tv

        That’s an important caveat. And it appears that increasingly manufacturers are adding that requirement.

        • cass80@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yup. I bought a roku tv last Nov for a spare bedroom. Thing would not operate without a wifi connection and roku account.

    • perishthethought@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 days ago

      I have mine disconnected from the network, but a certain non-techie member of my household (who doesn’t understand this stuff) keeps re-connecting it when they want Netflix to work, even though I’ve shown them how to do this without connecting the TV to the network.

      • VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’ve set up mine to automatically start on a specific HDMI port, that fixed the issue for confused family members.

        To find the feature though was not easy. Had to look up how to access the hotel mode hidden menu. Apparently LG has extra features it only wants hotels to be able to use.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          Apparently LG has extra features it only wants hotels to be able to use.

          It’s more that hotels will buy in bulk if a TV has the features they want - and those “hotel mode” controls being hidden from typical hotel guests is one of those features.

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Connect the TV to wifi, then go into your router’s settings and block it. It’s usually under “Access Control” or “Security”.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        Don’t worry, silicon valley is already making headway into government (where all the big guns and the monopoly on force is).

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 days ago

        The smart ones are sold at cost or at a loss, and your privacy is then sold to subsidize the profits. A dumb tv costs more money up front (since it’s not subsidized by your privacy), but it costs far less in overall value. It’s a tradeoff that the consumer needs to make. The lovely thing, is that (for now, at least) it is still a choice we can make.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            Not all tvs allow you to do that. Some require you to be online. Some took it a step further and are equipped with 4/5G modems to bypass your network restrictions.

            • oatscoop@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              A set of torx screwdrivers and an exacto knife will take care of that. Pretty hard for a cellular modem to transmit data when the traces to the antenna are cut.

            • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              Some require you to be online.

              I’d take it back to the store as broken. Never heard of that though.

              Some took it a step further and are equipped with 4/5G modems to bypass your network restrictions.

              Never heard of this either and it would raise a massive stink in the EU. Can you share an example?

              • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                Both of these were in the USA. The first was with a friend’s purchase, the latter was an article he sent me. It’s been a little while, but I know one was Samsung, but can’t remember the other brand or which was which.

                • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  I wouldn’t put it past Samsung to try and force you to have internet access enabled so they can spy on you.

                  However having additional hardware to directly access the internet via cellular is a bit much. That might have been an Aprils fools article by some IT site.

                  When Sony tried to install root kits on PCs of folks just trying to watch a movie on a legit purchased DVD there was a quite large shitstorm.

        • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Which is an entirely fair compromise for people who use Lemmy, but means precisely nothing to the majority.

          • locuester@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            Well that’s not true. They have been in business for 40 years. They sell TVs for people who don’t want anything except video in. Mainly commercial places like offices, stadiums, etc.

              • locuester@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                I’m not understanding what the point is that you’re trying to make? I’m sorry.

                • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  I said that the privacy concerns being worth the cost of a “smart”-free TV means nothing to the majority of people.

                  You said that this isn’t true, and that their main customer is commercial places.

                  I suggested, in response to this, that the majority of people don’t own such commercial places.

                  What part are you not understanding?

      • DdCno1@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        Keep in mind that these are low-end TVs with, according to reviewers, generally subpar picture and sound quality, with quality issues that make them worse to look at than even old TVs. If you just need “a TV” and your only concerns are that the device is flat, the image in color and some sort of noise is escaping the speaker holes, they’ll do, but don’t expect anything more than that. To me at least, it makes more sense to not connect a smart TV to the network and use a separate streaming device attached to it.

        I would even buy a slightly older used dumb TV from a reputable manufacturer over one of these sketchy things, since it’s not like LCD TVs are finicky technology - they tend to last for an incredibly long time in my experience, easily 15 years or more. On my parents’ 2008ish Toshiba (1080p and every analog and digital input in the known universe, which, in combination with an excellent analog upscaler, makes it awesome for old games consoles - but it’s of course no looker in terms of colors by modern standards), the only thing that has broken so far is the spring of the power button, so I bent a wire press it in and a switch at the plug to be able to turn it off completely.

        This is getting a bit off-topic, but a relative of mine replaced her flatscreen TV from 2002 (!) just two years ago - and it was still working fine, but since it only had an analog tuner and SD resolution, she was looking for an upgrade. I got her a small 4K OLED from Samsung (since discontinued) and she’s very happy with it (even the “smart” features are quite inoffensive), although I did have to get her a soundbar as well, because if there’s one thing that has regressed on TVs, it’s sound quality, in part due to how ever thinner and lighter designs have reduced speakers to little more than phone speakers on some devices.

  • Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m in the market for a new tv and all this crap just makes me want to scream in frustration. But prolonging the decision will just make it even worse.

    On top of that my 2017 shield is starting to show its age and there is really no comparable 4k (streaming) alternative thats not a security risk. I feel more and more pushed towards piracy, so that I can use my linux box and decide how and where to watch content. I hate it…

    • sanzky@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 days ago

      smart TVs mostly can be used as a dumb TV if you reject the terms of services when you set it up. I understand they are annoying, but people making such a big fuzz about them are clearly just fabricating drama.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 days ago

        You don’t even have to reject the terms of services, just never connect it to the internet. Not even once.

        Won’t even be able to send rejections to a server.

        I can recommend TLC, they can be used as a dumb TV and never need an internet connection if you just use it as a screen. Wouldn’t recommend them with internet though since the remote literally has a microphone build-in.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 days ago

          But I want to use the Internet. I want it to be able to access my network files and to cast video from my phone. Why does it have to be either all or nothing?

          • DdCno1@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            12 days ago

            Consider an Android TV device. Fire TV Stick at the low end, Shield TV Pro at the high end. Not much point to anything in between.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            And the next generation my well have capability to connect to cell towers or something (for your convenience!). Or just refuse to work without internet access (for security!).

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        Interesting. I wonder how long that will last.

        You really think the technology being inside there and capable of switching on at any time is just drama?

      • Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        I think it is a drama, because it’s not just the tvs doing that. Almost everything is getting more and more annoying and restricting. Things are starting to constantly nag you one way or another, shove things into your face you don’t care about, take away functionality and generally worsen user experience… It’s just mentally exhausting.

        And yes I know you can reliably turn that data collection stuff off (at least in the EU) but hopping through those hoops each and every time for each and every device and service can and will hollow out your resolve (and you have to find all the buried options every time…). Thats how you get masses that just don’t care anymore.

        • sanzky@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          I honestly think the issue is that these people want a SmartTV but are annoyed about its downsides. When I bought my current TV I disabled the smartOS but ended up enabling it back because I did find value on its features.

          I think the complaints are not well articulated. They do want the smart TV they just want good ones that dont spy on them or show ads.

    • Bad_Company_Daps@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Found any promising leads? My Samsung is still holding on but I know I’m counting the days until it’s time to replace it

      • Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’m still agonizing over it. However, I stopped caring as much and decided to focus on picture and capabilities. I’ll use it as dumb tv and try to beat whatever streamer will follow my shield into submission. Saves me getting a new dac for my hifi as well as none of my possible choices seem to support usb audio passthrough.

        My biggest problem right now is that I always end up in the premium oled section ;)

  • seemefeelme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 days ago

    I never understood why people hated smart TVs until one day mine decided to install an update that presents me with advertisements and a hub screen when I turn it on. If I don’t select something in time, the screen disappears, which locks all of the controls, and I can only reset it by turning it off and on again. Why??? Just why?!?!

  • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 days ago

    This is why I am dreading when my 2017 dumb TV dies. It’s really telling that dumb TVs, which should be cheaper to produce and sell, are either not available or very expensive (as in commercial displays). Really proves the point that the consumer is really the product.

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Projectors come with their own set of issues, but at least you can still get a really good one without all the “smart” features.

  • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 days ago

    Sounds like an obvious spot in the market for a bullshit-free smart TV. You’d just have to get the UX right.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Yeah, it’s bound to happen eventually, although they’ll probably never be exactly as good or cheap as the ones for the sucker mass-market. Think Fairphone.

      In the meanwhile, we just have to keep kludging in old solutions or alternate solutions, like a monitor. Or you could personally launch an enterprise if you’re so positioned, I guess.

      • pixelscript@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        I’m surprised I’ve yet to hear of a homebrew industry of completely cutting out the microcontrollers and soldering in a Pi or something to drive the raw display. I don’t predict it to be easy, but it doesn’t seem completely unobtainable?

        Flashing a custom bootloader would be even better, but I assume that hasn’t been done because they got that shit cryptographically locked down at the chip level.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          There’s definitely custom ROMs; I run one on my current phone. You should too, if your model makes it possible - they tend to be OSS Android forks and can do whatever the stock one can, but better. (DivestOS being my personal choice, for the Google-freeness)

          I suppose I could have cut out the SoC and replaced it with the same SoC but not locked already. I didn’t think of that, lol! Maybe I still could - it’s still relatively new, but selling the thing feels like letting a great evil back into the world. I have no idea how hard the particular one is to pull apart in a controlled manner.

          Using a different chip would be pretty hard. You said microcontroller, but a phone is closer in function to a desktop PC than a dishwasher. There’s high-bandwidth things going on and you’re going to need a lot of bespoke circuitry and software to kludge it. Forget about the end product having the same form factor, too.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Fuck, wrong thread.

              Somewhere else I was talking about a phone I bought expecting I could flash it, but that I couldn’t. I read this as a reply to that.

              Yeah, it seems like it should be doable. Actually, it’s weird that big monitors cost so much considering it’s the same size of display.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 days ago

    i haven’t even turned on my tv in over a year because of that bullshit. i’ve just been using a monitor + laptop + 2.1 pc speakers.

      • dmegatool@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        You can get an HD Homerun. It’s a network tuner so you plug the antenna in it and then, you can watch tv on pretty much any device through the app (pc, google tv, android, iOS, etc). You can even record, pause live tv, etc…

        Well that’s way beyond the original question, sorry to derail the thread ;)

        • perishthethought@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Never heard of that option so thanks for the info! That could be the missing piece if I ever get a non-Smart TV.

  • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    These fucking televisions have less ram than my fucking 8 year old phone

    At some point it’s just better to factory reset this bitch and paste an RPI in the back with my own android TV so it can actually run with 8gb ram 256gb space

  • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 days ago

    How about using computer for all the smart stuff and leaving all the visual stuff to the display? Besides, you can run Firefox and ublock origin to watch YT without ads, so what do you need a smart TV for?

      • Alice@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        12 days ago

        Last time I was looking for a TV I couldn’t find a single dumb TV unless I wanted to roll back to standard definition, which makes the text in a lot of modern video games unreadable.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 days ago

          But you don’t need a dumb TV.

          The smart part isn’t what makes those TVs bad. It is the internet connection that sends you ads, scrapes your data, causes lags and reboots because of updates, and makes your network less secure.

          Just connect an other device over HDMI like you would a dumb TV, and never connect it to the internet like you would a dumb TV.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 days ago

            Except some models won’t let you do anything until you “activate” your smart TV, which requires an internet connection.

          • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            12 days ago

            Wrong

            The “smart part” absolutely makes those TVs bad. The meme even addresses this with the line about hardware being ripped wholesale from an old smart phone. Smart TV hardware barely functions when it’s brand new. Fuck everything about smart TVs.

          • Kanda@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 days ago

            What if I just want the screen to turn on, displaying the last output I used? No, we gotta boot Android and then select the output through a menu for no reason

              • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                12 days ago

                Mine too, just takes a while to go through all the google, android, TLC screens before it gets there.

                Good thing that is only at the start.

          • Alice@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            That’s true. I was even more tech illiterate back then than I am now and couldn’t figure out how to switch inputs without going through the menu, which I couldn’t get to without connecting to the internet and going through the whole setup process.

            No going back now since I mostly cast from my phone these days since it’s the laziest way for me to watch without ads.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yeah… I got a Sony OLED as my most recent TV and the picture is incredible. Best I’ve ever seen.

          Even if I could find “dumb” TVs, I doubt they reach that level of quality.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          From my experience, it’s best to just buy a used dumb screen. Check if it’s working properly and doesn’t have any screen problems and you’re golden.

          • Alice@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 days ago

            That’s what I did, hence only finding standard def. :( I assumed that was the only option, actually. If someone is even making new ones, I’d probably have better luck there.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        People don’t hate ads enough to go through the trouble of using better options. Once you’ve lived without ads for a while, there’s no going back.

  • Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    99.9% of all these “problems” can be solved by using an ablocker DNS and a couple of adb commands (on Android).

      • Engywuck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        I went from pihole, to Adguard Home to (finally) ControlD. I chose to eventually outsource the DNS because I was letting all family without connection when playing with my miniserver :-P

      • Engywuck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Well, yeah, though luck… Amazon (the store) is entirely banned from my house.